Re: [PATCH] regulator: s2m,s5m: constify regulator_ops structures
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 08:20:43AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 03:58:00PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > The regulator_ops structures are never modified, so declare them as const. > > > Done with the help of Coccinelle. > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. > It works fine for me on today's linux-next (80c75a0f1d). What goes wrong? It just doesn't apply against my tree. Presumably there's a change somewhere else in -next (probably the MFD tree). signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH] regulator: s2m,s5m: constify regulator_ops structures
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 03:58:00PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > The regulator_ops structures are never modified, so declare them as const. > > Done with the help of Coccinelle. This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH] regulator: s2m,s5m: constify regulator_ops structures
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 03:58:00PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > The regulator_ops structures are never modified, so declare them as const. > > > > Done with the help of Coccinelle. > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. It works fine for me on today's linux-next (80c75a0f1d). What goes wrong? julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
