On 1 June 2012 18:09, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:47:44AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
1. There is one instance of 'struct platform_device' for each of the
spi controller instances (0/1/2) named s3c64xx-spi (in
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:47:44AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
1. There is one instance of 'struct platform_device' for each of the
spi controller instances (0/1/2) named s3c64xx-spi (in
arch/arm/plat-samsung/devs.c).
Right, which looks rather like it is specific to s3c64xx at least given
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:05:42AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 30 May 2012 18:13, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
No there isn't. You've got things like s3c64xx_device_spi0 in
arch/arm/plat-samsung/devs.c (which you'd expect since the resources
that are passed in
On 31 May 2012 19:36, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:05:42AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 30 May 2012 18:13, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
No there isn't. You've got things like s3c64xx_device_spi0 in
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 03:03:31PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
- s3c64xx_spi0_set_platdata(s3c64xx_spi0_pdata, 0, 1);
+ s3c64xx_spi0_set_platdata(s3c6410-spi, NULL, 0, 1);
...
+
On 30 May 2012 15:28, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 03:03:31PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
- s3c64xx_spi0_set_platdata(s3c64xx_spi0_pdata, 0, 1);
+
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:28:55AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Mark Brown
This dev_name also isn't equivalent to dev_name() which makes matters
more confusing than they need to be.
Looks like they use the name as the magic string to pick initialization
On 30 May 2012 17:34, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:28:55AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Mark Brown
This dev_name also isn't equivalent to dev_name() which makes matters
more confusing than they need to be.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:05:31PM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 30 May 2012 17:34, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
Right, and there's no problem at all with using the name. The thing is
that there's no need to set the name at runtime since the struct device
being
On 30 May 2012 18:13, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:05:31PM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 30 May 2012 17:34, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
Right, and there's no problem at all with using the name. The thing is
10 matches
Mail list logo
