Hi Dave,
If the NetAPP target is misconfigured, why would it even allow any unknown
initiator to go beyond discovery session? It appears that a
semi-successful lun scan has happened or am mis reading the report?
If I read deeper into your comments, does the target support ACL's?
If yes, then
I approve this, please apply to kernel.org branch.
Second time this has been submitted, been integrated since November 24th
in 1.1.5-2370 of the Adaptec Branch of the driver.
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andre Hedrick wrote:
Hi Dave,
If the NetAPP target is misconfigured, why would it even allow any
unknown
initiator to go beyond discovery session? It appears that a
semi-successful lun scan has happened or am mis reading the report?
I think you're misreading the report and/or don't understand
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make some needlessly global functions static
- remove one more kernel 2.2 #ifdef
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/gdth.c | 24
drivers/scsi/gdth.h | 41
This patch makes a needlessly global struct static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-full/drivers/scsi/ch.c.old 2005-02-28
18:14:48.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-full/drivers/scsi/ch.c 2005-02-28 18:14:55.0
+0100
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- remove or #if 0 the following unused finctions:
- tul_pop_pend_scb
- tul_device_reset
- tul_reset_scsi_bus
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/initio.c | 85
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 16:11 +0900, Yokota Hiroshi wrote:
+ if (data-CurrentSC != NULL) {
+ nsp_msg(KERN_WARNING, CurrentSC!=NULL this can't be happen);
SCpnt-result = DID_BAD_TARGET 16;
nsp_scsi_done(SCpnt);
- return 0;
+
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 22:44 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
James, please withdraw the patch above.
Actually, I already have this in the tree. Could you just do an
incremental to remove the blacklist line since I think the IBM people
still want their shark fix?
Thanks,
James
-
To unsubscribe from
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- kill the unused global *_version and *_version_str variables
in the firmware files
The firmware files are generated, so it'd be better to leave
Before I'm getting flamed to death:
This patch contains possible cleanups. If parts of this patch conflict
with pending changes these parts of my patch have to be dropped.
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- remove or #if 0 the following
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:29:20PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- kill the unused global *_version and *_version_str variables
in the firmware
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:35:29PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi Andries,
your patch has many overlappings with a patch of mine aleady in -mm
(both none of the two patches is a subset of the other one).
Nowadays, working against -mm often avoids duplicate work.
cu
Adrian
As far as I
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
As Christoph mentioned, the firmware images are auto-generated, so I'd
rather hold off on those deltas. Besides, I'm hoping in the near
future to drop the firmware from the
This patch #if 0's the following EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed but unused functions:
- fc_target_block
- fc_target_unblock
- fc_host_block
- fc_host_unblock
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
If the inclusion of code using these functions into the kernel is
pending, please ignore my patch.
This patch makes a needlessly global function static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c |2 +-
drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.h |1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:00:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch #if 0's the following EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed but unused functions:
- fc_target_block
- fc_target_unblock
- fc_host_block
- fc_host_unblock
A driver using them is scheduled to be merged soon, and at least one
other will be
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:31:59PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Before I'm getting flamed to death:
This patch contains possible cleanups. If parts of this patch conflict
with pending changes these parts of my patch have to be dropped.
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
-
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:25:09PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
...
- constants.c: scsi_print_hostbyte
- constants.c: scsi_print_driverbyte
these we'll probably keep for now.
...
keep = #if 0 ?
cu
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 12:01:55AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:25:09PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
...
- constants.c: scsi_print_hostbyte
- constants.c: scsi_print_driverbyte
these we'll probably keep for now.
...
keep = #if 0 ?
In this case yes,
Updated patch:
-- snip --
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- remove the following unused functions:
- scsi.h: print_driverbyte
- scsi.h: print_hostbyte
- #if 0 the following unused functions:
- constants.c: scsi_print_hostbyte
-
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 09:02 -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:57:39AM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 03:38 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 23:21 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
Don't use
Hi,
I would like to announce the iSCSI enterprise target (IET) software,
which is open-source software to build iSCSI storage systems. It can
provide disk volumes to iSCSI initiators by using any kinds of files
(regular files, block devices, virtual block devices like RAID and
LVM, etc). The
22 matches
Mail list logo
