Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8885] New: Unable to access memory card reader anymore

2007-08-13 Thread Andrew Morton
(resend, fixed mailing list address) On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:07:36 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8885 > >Summary: Unable to access memory card reader anymore >Product: IO/Storage >Version: 2.5 > KernelVe

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8885] New: Unable to access memory card reader anymore

2007-08-13 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:13:54 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm struggling a bit to work out if this is a scsi bug, a USB bug, an > MMC bug or whatever. But it's a bug. > I can't see anything MMC related in his dmesg, only what seems to be a USB based reader: scsi 0:0:0:0:

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8885] New: Unable to access memory card reader anymore

2007-08-13 Thread James Bottomley
> I'm struggling a bit to work out if this is a scsi bug, a USB bug, an MMC bug > or whatever. But it's a bug. > > Michal, can you please track this as a post-2.6.22 regression? > > Others: can you please take a look at the dmesg output, see if we can work > out which subsystem is (newly) failin

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8885] New: Unable to access memory card reader anymore

2007-08-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:07:36 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8885 > >Summary: Unable to access memory card reader anymore >Product: IO/Storage >Version: 2.5 > KernelVersion: 2.6.23-rc3 > Platform:

Re: Unexpected busfree in Message-in phase

2007-08-13 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 13/08/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jesper, > > On 11/08/07, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just noticed this in dmesg : > > > > [ 3216.262987] (scsi0:A:4:0): Unexpected busfree in Message-in phase > > [ 3216.263058] SEQADDR == 0x16c > > [ 3216.2

Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.23-rc2

2007-08-13 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Aug 13 2007, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Jens Axboe wrote: > > >#for-akpm is usually only in very few -mm release anyway, so it's not > > >like it would have made much difference. We/you/I need to improve that, > > >certainly. > > > > > >Honestly, for bsg

Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.23-rc2

2007-08-13 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Aug 13 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > >#for-akpm is usually only in very few -mm release anyway, so it's not > >like it would have made much difference. We/you/I need to improve that, > >certainly. > > > >Honestly, for bsg, it wasn't much of an issue. We had build problems >

Re: [patch 07/30] Incorrect SCSI transfer length computation from odd sized scsi_execute_async() transfers.

2007-08-13 Thread Mike Christie
Jeremy Linton wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jeremy Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Any function which use scsi_execute_async() and transfers "odd" sized data that doesn't align correctly with the segment sizes may have its transfer length padded out to the closest segment size. I would

Re: [PATCH] [418/2many] MAINTAINERS - SCSI CDROM DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Aug 13 2007, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 12:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > +F: drivers/scsi/sr.* > > Not correct, it should be sr* > > SCSI CDROM DRIVER > P:Jens Axboe > M:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > L:linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > W:http://www.kernel.dk > S:

Re: [PATCH] [418/2many] MAINTAINERS - SCSI CDROM DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 12:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > +F: drivers/scsi/sr.* > Not correct, it should be sr* SCSI CDROM DRIVER P: Jens Axboe M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] L: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org W: http://www.kernel.dk S: Maintained F: drivers/scsi/sr* - To unsubscri

RE: [PATCH] [21/2many] MAINTAINERS - AACRAID SCSI RAID DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Salyzyn, Mark
Please do not collapse AACRAID with DPT_I2O and IPS yet. IMHO Just because today the maintainer email is the same is not a reason to collapse, I am only 'paid' to look after aacraid and that one is provided continued Adaptec support, the others are legacy and maintenance-only. Sincerely -- Mark Sa

RE: [PATCH] [21/2many] MAINTAINERS - AACRAID SCSI RAID DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 10:16 -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > Second thoughts ... Add the documentation file as well. > +F: Documentation/scsi/aacraid.txt AACRAID SCSI RAID DRIVER P: Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] L: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org W: http://www.adapt

[CORRECTED PATCH 4/6] qla2xxx: Correct 8GB iIDMA support.

2007-08-13 Thread Andrew Vasquez
Original implementation manipulated the FC_GS values for port-speed. Transition the codes to use the driver's own internal representations as this makes for a reduction in duplicate 'conversion' codes throughout the driver. Signed-off-by: Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- James,

Re: [patch 0/4] Updated AN patches, now without gendisk

2007-08-13 Thread Kristen Carlson Accardi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:00:53 +0200 "Kay Sievers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/8/07, Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here is an updated set of patches that implement Asynchronous Notification > > support for ATAPI devices. In this version I no longer export the AN > > c

Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.23-rc2

2007-08-13 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jens Axboe wrote: #for-akpm is usually only in very few -mm release anyway, so it's not like it would have made much difference. We/you/I need to improve that, certainly. Honestly, for bsg, it wasn't much of an issue. We had build problems when bsg was merged which was unfortunate but got fixed

Re: Unexpected busfree in Message-in phase

2007-08-13 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Jesper, On 11/08/07, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed this in dmesg : > > [ 3216.262987] (scsi0:A:4:0): Unexpected busfree in Message-in phase > [ 3216.263058] SEQADDR == 0x16c > [ 3216.263724] target0:0:4: FAST-10 SCSI 10.0 MB/s ST (100 ns, offset 16) > > That's

Re: [patch 07/30] Incorrect SCSI transfer length computation from odd sized scsi_execute_async() transfers.

2007-08-13 Thread Jeremy Linton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jeremy Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Any function which use scsi_execute_async() and transfers "odd" sized data that doesn't align correctly with the segment sizes may have its transfer length padded out to the closest segment size. I would like to strongly s

Re: [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array

2007-08-13 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 13/08/07, James Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok here's what happened, > > - We changed the define so that it matched what we are using. We never > configure >more than 4 HBQ, thus the index will never be beyond 0-3. The if-check is > actually >innoculous. Given that the chang

RE: [PATCH] [21/2many] MAINTAINERS - AACRAID SCSI RAID DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Salyzyn, Mark
Second thoughts ... Add the documentation file as well. F: drivers/scsi/aacraid/ +F: Documentation/scsi/aacraid.txt Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn > -Original Message- > From: Salyzyn, Mark > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 9:34 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; > 'l

RE: [PATCH] [19/2many] MAINTAINERS - IPS SCSI RAID DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Salyzyn, Mark
ACK Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; AACRAID > Subject: [PATCH] [19/2many] MAINTAINER

RE: [PATCH] [20/2many] MAINTAINERS - DPT_I2O SCSI RAID DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Salyzyn, Mark
ACK Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; AACRAID > Subject: [PATCH] [20/2many] MAINTAINER

RE: [PATCH] [21/2many] MAINTAINERS - AACRAID SCSI RAID DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Salyzyn, Mark
ACK Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; AACRAID > Subject: [PATCH] [21/2many] MAINTAINER

Re: [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array

2007-08-13 Thread James Smart
Ok here's what happened, - We changed the define so that it matched what we are using. We never configure more than 4 HBQ, thus the index will never be beyond 0-3. The if-check is actually innoculous. Given that the change wasn't your patch, we didn't include you as the author. - Codi

[kj] is_power_of_2 in scsi

2007-08-13 Thread vignesh babu
Replacing n & (n - 1) for power of 2 check by is_power_of_2(n) Signed-off-by: vignesh babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c index 77b06a9..908f342 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include

Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.23-rc2

2007-08-13 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, Aug 07 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:38:44 -0500 James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:11 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > James Bottomley wrote: > > > > The initial bsg submit went via the block git tree ... which I believe > > > >

Re: [PATCH] [541/2many] MAINTAINERS - WD7000 SCSI DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:39:41PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry Uh, what the fuck? You're posting over *500* patches to the same file? Just post one patch and people can respond to the bits of it that concern them. -- "Bill, look, we understand that you

Re: [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array

2007-08-13 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 13/08/07, James Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NACK > > The fix is contained in our 8.2.2 sources recently posted and pushed by James > as part of his last scsi fixes. > I actually did look for it, but couldn't find any lpfc commits with me listed as author, so I assumed it had not been mer

Re: [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array

2007-08-13 Thread James Smart
NACK The fix is contained in our 8.2.2 sources recently posted and pushed by James as part of his last scsi fixes. -- james s Jesper Juhl wrote: (previously send on 09-Aug-2007 20:47) Hi, The Coverity checker noticed that we may overrun a statically allocated array in drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc

Re: [PATCH] [418/2many] MAINTAINERS - SCSI CDROM DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Aug 12 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index c08c8af..d7a1c74 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -3981,6 +3981,7 @@ M: [EMAIL PROTECT

[PATCH] [166/2many] MAINTAINERS - EATA-DMA SCSI DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread joe
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 8c79559..a8b11ba 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -1616,8 +1616,10 @@ F: include/linux/dvb/ EATA-DMA SCSI DRIVER P: Michael Neuffer -L: [

[PATCH] [168/2many] MAINTAINERS - EATA-PIO SCSI DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread joe
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 144c052..45ce2d4 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -1631,8 +1631,10 @@ F: drivers/scsi/eata* EATA-PIO SCSI DRIVER P: Michael Neuffer M: [EM

[PATCH] [541/2many] MAINTAINERS - WD7000 SCSI DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread joe
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index d8ee850..4172b36 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5112,12 +5112,15 @@ M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] L: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.hpl.hp.com/pe

[PATCH] [486/2many] MAINTAINERS - U14-34F SCSI DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread joe
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 374ee9b..e28c8d4 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -4609,6 +4609,7 @@ P:Dario Ballabio M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] L: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH] [421/2many] MAINTAINERS - SCSI TAPE DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread joe
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c4d29d9..2e15975 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -4006,6 +4006,7 @@ P:Kai Mäkisara M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] L: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org S

[PATCH] [420/2many] MAINTAINERS - SCSI SUBSYSTEM

2007-08-13 Thread joe
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c156f9f..c4d29d9 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3998,6 +3998,8 @@ M:[EMAIL PROTECTED] L: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org T: git kernel.org:

[PATCH] [418/2many] MAINTAINERS - SCSI CDROM DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread joe
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c08c8af..d7a1c74 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3981,6 +3981,7 @@ M:[EMAIL PROTECTED] L: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org W: http://www.kern

[PATCH] [419/2many] MAINTAINERS - SCSI SG DRIVER

2007-08-13 Thread joe
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index d7a1c74..c156f9f 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3989,6 +3989,8 @@ M:[EMAIL PROTECTED] L: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org W: http://www.torq