On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:06:26 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Hi!
>
> the driver drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c has code like:
>
> static int isd200_action( struct us_data *us, int action,
> void* pointer, int value )
>
> ...
>
> case ACTION_READ_STATUS:
> US_DEBUGP(" isd
Hi!
the driver drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c has code like:
static int isd200_action( struct us_data *us, int action,
void* pointer, int value )
...
case ACTION_READ_STATUS:
US_DEBUGP(" isd200_action(READ_STATUS)\n");
ata.generic.ActionSelect = ACTION_SELECT_0
Hi,
This patch removes linux/stat.h from scsi drivers.
Tested with allyesconfig and allmodconfig.
Regards,
Michal
--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
Signed-off-by: Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c b/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c
index 9b20617..8e91
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 05:37:17PM +0200, Christof Schmitt wrote:
> unsigned long show_host_system_hostname:1;
> +
> + /* The driver can disable the LUN scanning from the FC transport class
> */
> + unsigned long disable_target_scan:1;
> };
The comment exceeds 80 columns. Why
From: Christof Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Introduce a flag that allows the SCSI low level device driver to
disable the automatic scanning for LUNs from the FC transport class.
This is for the zfcp device driver that manages the attached units on
its own and does not want to have the automatic di
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:03:17AM -0400, James Smart wrote:
> Nit (but preferred) : change "no_target_scan" to "disable_target_scan".
> Otherwise, patch is good.
Ok. I will send the fixed version in a separate mail.
> Yep. However, I don't agree with Hannes in this case. Given that the
> firm
Nit (but preferred) : change "no_target_scan" to "disable_target_scan".
Otherwise, patch is good.
Christof Schmitt wrote:
I attached a new patch that adds a flag to the fc template. So far, it
is untested. What is the better approach? Avoid scanning with the flag
being 1 or use the 1 to enable
James,
thanks for the feedback.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 09:07:23PM -0400, James Smart wrote:
> I'd prefer a flag/bit in the fc template to indicate no scanning by the
> transport. Thus, it's up to the driver to call __scsi_add_device, or
> perform the appropriate scans...
I attached a new patch
8 matches
Mail list logo