On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 10:37 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 10:03 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 17:04 -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
I'm going to guess that this is the entry in feature-removal.txt
On Monday 11 February 2008 09:02:06 am James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:23 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:25 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
please check it...
This one looks perfect, thanks!
Well, nearly perfect. I corrected this typo:
+
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 05:45 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:19:30PM -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
The device does send these error messages currently, but it takes some
time to get the check condition back, which adds up the time to boot
especially when the # of
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:08:05 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:30 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 21:47 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
- if (request_region(*base, 256, aic7xxx) == 0)
+ if (!request_region(*base, 256, aic7xxx))
This patch is
Seriously, can't you just add a disclaimer to the README file?
In http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/9/29, Luben Tuikov made an interesting
point that in many cases illegal refers to a valid value that violates
the specification, so the term invalid may be technically incorrect.
Benny
On Feb. 11,
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:30 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 21:47 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
- if (request_region(*base, 256, aic7xxx) == 0)
+ if (!request_region(*base, 256, aic7xxx))
This patch is completely pointless.
It removes a sparse warning.
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:25 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
please check it...
This one looks perfect, thanks!
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 17:43 +0200, Pete Wyckoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:29 +0200:
iscsi bidi support at the generic libiscsi level
- prepare the additional bidi_read rlength header.
- access the right scsi_in() and/or scsi_out() side of
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Mark Hounschell wrote:
linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
The correct word should be invalid, in spite of
the fact that the SCSI committee used invalid syntax.
Alan is right. There is nothing illegal in the kernel
and if there is, it must be removed as soon as it
is
This patch was submitted as [PATCH 2/3] yesterday, since it did not reach the
list due to CC errors sending this again.
It is regenerated against new git tree.
The system power state changes like hibernation and standby are not happening
properly with 106XE controllers, this patch modifies the
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 18:36 +0530, Prakash, Sathya wrote:
This patch was submitted as [PATCH 2/3] yesterday, since it did not reach the
list due to CC errors sending this again.
It is regenerated against new git tree.
The system power state changes like hibernation and standby are not
It looks like there's been a bug in the module parameter setup forever.
The upshot doesn't really matter, because even if no parameters are ever
set, we just call sym53c416_setup() three times, but the zero values in
the arrays eventually cause nothing to happen. Unfortunately gcc has
started to
Patch 1 of 1
This patch allows us to display information about all of the logical volumes
configured on a particular without stepping on memory even when there are
many volumes (128 or more) configured. This patch replaces the one submitted
on 20071214. See
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 13:13 -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 10:37 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 10:03 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 17:04 -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
I'm
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:17 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:08:05 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:30 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 21:47 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
- if (request_region(*base, 256, aic7xxx) == 0)
+
I turned on the option to flag deprecated code, and
these two popped up:
Driver 'sd' needs updating - please use bus_type methods
Driver 'sr' needs updating - please use bus_type methods
I'm assuming these are referring to the SCSI devices?
I'm assuming they are already known about?
Just
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:23 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:25 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
please check it...
This one looks perfect, thanks!
Well, nearly perfect. I corrected this typo:
+ if (!buf)
+ goto simple_polulate;
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 21:47 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
- if (request_region(*base, 256, aic7xxx) == 0)
+ if (!request_region(*base, 256, aic7xxx))
This patch is completely pointless. if (x == 0) and if (!x) mean
identical things and there's no style standard preferring one form over
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:24 +0530, Prakash, Sathya wrote:
I tried to send few patches on last friday, out of which only one
reached the list I resent the rest two and again only on reached the list
Again I have resent the third patch two times, but they are still to reach
the list. I am
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 12:24 +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:38:15AM +0100, Kars de Jong wrote:
Thomas, can't you use ioreadxx() and friends instead of rolling your own
memory mapped I/O handlers?
well, at least ioread32be/iowrite32be are looking promising, but
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:47:57AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 0:44 +0200, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew this patch was in -mm for two month or so. I was under the impression
that you have an arm cross compiler that tries to build every -mm kernel.
Is it
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 0:44 +0200, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 22:02 +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:20:24AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:58 +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:29 +0200:
iscsi bidi support at the generic libiscsi level
- prepare the additional bidi_read rlength header.
- access the right scsi_in() and/or scsi_out() side of things.
also for resid.
- Handle BIDI underflow overflow from target
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 10:40 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Clear drain buffer before chaining if the command in question is a
write.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
block/blk-merge.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:27:46AM -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 05:45 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:19:30PM -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
The device does send these error messages currently, but it takes some
time to get the check
Luben Tuikov wrote:
Is there an open iSCSI Target implementation which
does NOT
issue commands to sub-target devices via the SCSI
mid-layer, but
bypasses it completely?
What do you mean? To call directly low level backstorage
SCSI drivers
queuecommand() routine? What are advantages of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:05 +0200:
You are most probably right I will investigate what happened. It looks
like I went back to some old version right? or a merge fallout
Thanks for reviewing.
Please also test latest head-of-line code if possible + iscsi patches
+ last
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:38:15AM +0100, Kars de Jong wrote:
Thomas, can't you use ioreadxx() and friends instead of rolling your own
memory mapped I/O handlers?
well, at least ioread32be/iowrite32be are looking promising, but a quick
grep didn't show them for m68k.
readxx() and friends are
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 12:02 +0200, Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:47:57AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 0:44 +0200, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew this patch was in -mm for two month or so. I was under the impression
that
29 matches
Mail list logo
