On 11/09/12 21:46, Jeff Moyer wrote:
On 11/06/12 16:41, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
It's certainly better to tie them all to one node then let them be
randomly scattered across nodes; your 6% observation may simply be
from that.
How do you think these compare, though (for
On 11/09/12 20:18, Jeff Moyer wrote:
- cmd = kmem_cache_zalloc(pool-cmd_slab, gfp_mask | pool-gfp_mask);
+ cmd = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pool-cmd_slab,
+ gfp_mask | pool-gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO,
+ node);
Hello Jeff,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:00:14PM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
From: Nicholas Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org
Hello everyone,
This patch to update copyright year to current for principal target core
ownership is now being pushed into target-pending/for-next.
Signed-off-by:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:15:21PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:00:14PM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
From: Nicholas Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org
Hello everyone,
This patch to update copyright year to current for principal target core
ownership
This thread is certainly fascinating. As someone who has enforced the
GPL for over a decade, and who coordinates a coalition of Linux
developers who do GPL enforcement, I am very concerned about any
accusation of GPL violation, and I hope that this situation can be
resolved reasonably and
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
This patch to update copyright year to current for principal target core
ownership is now being pushed into target-pending/for-next.
Pardon me, but you were just publicly accused of violating the GPL, so
your
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 16:18 -0800, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
This patch to update copyright year to current for principal target core
ownership is now being pushed into target-pending/for-next.
Pardon me, but you
7 matches
Mail list logo
