On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 12:00:36AM -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
-static int transport_cmd_check_stop(struct se_cmd *cmd, bool
remove_from_lists)
+static int transport_cmd_check_stop(struct se_cmd *cmd, bool
remove_from_lists,
+ bool write_pending)
...
-
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:34:19PM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
From: Nicholas Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org
This patch makes target_execute_cmd() set CMD_T_BUSY|CMD_T_SENT while
holding se_cmd-t_state_lock, in order to avoid the extra aquire/release
in __target_execute_cmd().
Can
On 06/07/13 21:06, Saurav Kashyap wrote:
Thanks for the patches. Please share the warnings reported by Coverity, so
that its easy for us to review the patches.
Hello Saurav,
The Coverity warnings that led me to developing this patch series are as
follows:
- For patches 1, 2, 3, 8: Logically
2013/6/6 Imre Deak imre.d...@intel.com:
Looks ok to me, perhaps adding the seek functionality to the mapping
iterator would make things more generic and the mapping iterator more
resemble the page iterator. So we'd have a new sg_miter_start_offset and
call it here something like:
2013/6/7 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org:
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:52:56PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
+static bool sg_miter_get_next_page(struct sg_mapping_iter *miter)
+{
+ if (!miter-__remaining) {
+ struct scatterlist *sg;
+ unsigned long pgoffset;
+
+
2013/6/7 Martin K. Petersen martin.peter...@oracle.com:
Akinobu == Akinobu Mita akinobu.m...@gmail.com writes:
Akinobu So Martin and Douglas, can I have your ACKs on this patch
Akinobu series for now?
Only concern is the one I mentioned before: You're mapping and unmapping
the ppage for
On 06/08, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
+unsigned tag_alloc(struct tag_pool *pool, bool wait)
+{
+ struct tag_cpu_freelist *tags;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned ret;
+retry:
+ preempt_disable();
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ tags = this_cpu_ptr(pool-tag_cpu);
+
+
7 matches
Mail list logo
