On Feb 18, 2008 4:11 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you please help me just once more? 2.6.25-rc2 fixed this bug in a
> bit different way by chance. Please test 2.6.25-rc2 with the attached
> patch to make sure that ips in 2.6.25 works well.
Confirmed...the patch below agains
si_add_host(sh, &ha->pcidev->dev);
which appears to fix things for me.
--
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
ion as well.
Assuming this patch is accepted for 2.6.25, please also queue it for
the 2.6.23/24 stable trees.
Thank you very much for your help in tracking this issue down!
--
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "
ng
0005 things break. I wont be able to test anything else until tomorrow
when I can phycisally reset the machine...
--
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [E
driver.
I wasn't thinking Friday...we already expected 0001 to fix it, so the
hope is one of the others breaks it and that is useful info. I'll apply
and test the rest of the series. Sorry!
--
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from thi
is totally wrong. That's not it. Sorry
>
> Boaz
>
You sure? I was about to give it a quick run...but I guess I wont then. :)
--
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the
e driver appeared to function fine.
> If so, the second patch is broken. Did you saw BUG_ON message (I added
> some BUG_ON to the patch)?
I did not apply the 0002 patch.
--
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
preciate your efforts so far in trying to find what
could be wrong here!
--
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri 15 Feb at 09:13:16 +0900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Thanks. So we surely have a bug in the non-breakup part.
>
> I've just found one bug. Can you try this patch against 2.6.24?
Tested and unfortunately no change. Behaves same as the breakup-revert patch.
--
Ti
a/0x2f0
Feb 14 16:04:28 ipstest kernel: [ 1061.864406] [x86_64_start_kernel+298/320]
_sinittext+0x12a/0x140
Feb 14 16:04:28 ipstest kernel: [ 1061.864585]
That second trace then is repeatedly dumping every 12seconds without end.
--
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Cent
consistent returns ha->scbs@ 0x18446604437762007040
pci_alloc_consistent returns ips_sg.list @ 0x18446604437762002944
pci_alloc_consistent returns ha->scbs@ 0x18446604437698871296
pci_alloc_consistent returns ips_sg.list @ 0x18446604437756837888
I take that as ips_init_phase2() being called and presumab
vely easy (unfortunately
no remote power or serial console available) to test patches...
--
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Having the checker check for this change isn't a solution...it
shouldn't prevent any data corruption. Even if you check prior to
every IO, you still have an obvious race between the check and the
subsequent IO. You gain the ability to recognise the problem and
somehow magically warn the user (eg:
13 matches
Mail list logo
