David S. Miller wrote:
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:23:20 -0500
Actually, I saw this and increased MAX_LINKS as well.
That does absolutely nothing, you cannot create sockets
with protocol numbers larger than NPROTOS which like MAX_LINKS
has the value 32.
Dmitry Yusupov wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 15:23 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 12:53 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:32:42 -0500
FIB has taken your netlink number, so I changed it to 32
MAX_LINKS is 32,
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 13:08 -0700, Alex Aizman wrote:
This is open-iscsi/linux-iscsi-5 Initiator. This submission is ready for
inclusion into mainline kernel.
OK, I tried to put this into scsi-misc.
FIB has taken your netlink number, so I changed it to 32
__nlm_put() has had an updated
James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 13:08 -0700, Alex Aizman wrote:
This is open-iscsi/linux-iscsi-5 Initiator. This submission is ready for
inclusion into mainline kernel.
OK, I tried to put this into scsi-misc.
FIB has taken your netlink number, so I changed it to 32
OK.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 11:36:22AM -0700, Alex Aizman wrote:
OK. Hopefully that'll remain.
Please ask davem for a netlink number allocation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:32:42 -0500
FIB has taken your netlink number, so I changed it to 32
MAX_LINKS is 32, so there is no way this reassignment would
work.
You have to pick something in the range 0 -- 32, and as is
no surprise, there are no numbers
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 12:53 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:32:42 -0500
FIB has taken your netlink number, so I changed it to 32
MAX_LINKS is 32, so there is no way this reassignment would
work.
Actually, I saw this and
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 15:23 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 12:53 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:32:42 -0500
FIB has taken your netlink number, so I changed it to 32
MAX_LINKS is 32, so there is no
From: Dmitry Yusupov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:25:28 -0700
It would be nice to set MAX_LINKS to 64 and close this issue for now,
James and Dmitry, increasing MAX_LINKS does't work, did you actually
try to open a netlink socket with a protocol number larger than 32?
It will
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:23:20 -0500
Actually, I saw this and increased MAX_LINKS as well.
That does absolutely nothing, you cannot create sockets
with protocol numbers larger than NPROTOS which like MAX_LINKS
has the value 32. And NPROTOS is something
10 matches
Mail list logo
