[PATCH] dpt_i2o: don't set DMA_64BIT_MASK [was: Re: [stable] broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2 check page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)]

2007-12-13 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to Greg KH: So, what should be added to 2.6.23-stable then? And, can I get a real changelog entry for it? This is suitable for both 2.6.23.x and 2.6.24-rc5 : linux-2.6-dpt_i2o-no-dma64.patch The dpt_i2o driver can't handle 64 bit DMA addresses, so do not let it set

Re: [PATCH] dpt_i2o: don't set DMA_64BIT_MASK [was: Re: [stable] broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2 check page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)]

2007-12-13 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 11:11 +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: According to Greg KH: So, what should be added to 2.6.23-stable then? And, can I get a real changelog entry for it? This is suitable for both 2.6.23.x and 2.6.24-rc5 : linux-2.6-dpt_i2o-no-dma64.patch Actually, this