On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 02:37:00AM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 05/31/2013 04:46 PM, Brian King wrote:
>
> >
> >>The 'ctl' field of the 'struct ata_taskfile' is not really dual purpose,
> >>i.e.
> >>it is not intended for storing the alternate status register (which is
> >>ma
Hello.
On 05/31/2013 04:46 PM, Brian King wrote:
The 'ctl' field of the 'struct ata_taskfile' is not really dual purpose, i.e.
it is not intended for storing the alternate status register (which is mapped
at the same address in the legacy IDE controllers) in the qc_fill_rtf() method.
No oth
On 05/21/2013 02:24 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> The 'ctl' field of the 'struct ata_taskfile' is not really dual purpose, i.e.
> it is not intended for storing the alternate status register (which is mapped
> at the same address in the legacy IDE controllers) in the qc_fill_rtf()
> method.
> No
The 'ctl' field of the 'struct ata_taskfile' is not really dual purpose, i.e.
it is not intended for storing the alternate status register (which is mapped
at the same address in the legacy IDE controllers) in the qc_fill_rtf() method.
No other 'libata' driver except 'drivers/scsi/ipr.c' stores t
4 matches
Mail list logo