Re: [PATCH] scsi: bfa: bfad_attr.c: Optimization of the Code

2014-06-06 Thread Rickard Strandqvist
Hi Several have remarked in the other patch for strncpy I posted. That there is a strlcpy that works exactly as one would like to strncpy was done :) And the return value is like for snprintf, but quite a lot faster! So I submit patches based with it instead, and did a couple more exchanges of sn

[PATCH] scsi: bfa: bfad_attr.c: Optimization of the code

2014-06-06 Thread Rickard Strandqvist
Minimized the use of snprintf() And removed a variable that was only used for the temporary storage. Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist --- drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad_attr.c | 114 -- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi

Re: [PATCH] scsi: bfa: bfad_attr.c: Optimization of the Code

2014-06-05 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 06/05/14 08:55, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 06/04/14 20:08, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > This is ugly. Please use sprintf(buf, "%.*s\n", PAGE_SIZE - 1, str) > instead of strncpy() + strlen(). (replying to my own e-mail) The above should of course have read "sprintf(buf, "%.*s\n", PAGE_SIZE - 2

Re: [PATCH] scsi: bfa: bfad_attr.c: Optimization of the Code

2014-06-04 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 06/04/14 20:08, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > Minimized the use of snprintf() > And removed a variable that was only used for the temporary storage. > > This was partly found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. > > Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist > --- > drivers/scsi/bfa/

[PATCH] scsi: bfa: bfad_attr.c: Optimization of the Code

2014-06-04 Thread Rickard Strandqvist
Minimized the use of snprintf() And removed a variable that was only used for the temporary storage. This was partly found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist --- drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad_attr.c | 14 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertion