On 21/11/2016 14:25, Quentin Lambert wrote:
On 11/21/2016 03:16 PM, John Garry wrote:
On 21/11/2016 13:20, Quentin Lambert wrote:
On 11/21/2016 01:53 PM, John Garry wrote:
However I have noticed that we should do a call to hisi_sas_free() for
this failure, and later failures in the probe.
On 11/21/2016 03:16 PM, John Garry wrote:
On 21/11/2016 13:20, Quentin Lambert wrote:
On 11/21/2016 01:53 PM, John Garry wrote:
However I have noticed that we should do a call to hisi_sas_free() for
this failure, and later failures in the probe.
I don't understand why, and would welcome the
On 21/11/2016 13:20, Quentin Lambert wrote:
On 11/21/2016 01:53 PM, John Garry wrote:
However I have noticed that we should do a call to hisi_sas_free() for
this failure, and later failures in the probe.
I don't understand why, and would welcome the opportunity to learn
something.
We call
On 11/21/2016 01:53 PM, John Garry wrote:
However I have noticed that we should do a call to hisi_sas_free() for
this failure, and later failures in the probe.
I don't understand why, and would welcome the opportunity to learn
something.
Quentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
On 19/11/2016 17:42, Quentin Lambert wrote:
Most error branches following the call to hisi_sas_shost_alloc contain
a call to kfree. This patch add these calls where they are
missing.
This issue was found with Hector.
I think that this patch is fine. However I have noticed that we should
do a
Most error branches following the call to hisi_sas_shost_alloc contain
a call to kfree. This patch add these calls where they are
missing.
This issue was found with Hector.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Lambert
---
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c |6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+),
6 matches
Mail list logo
