Re: [PATCH 0/20] fix misspelling of current function in string

2014-12-09 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi Julia, On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Julian Calaby wrote: > >> Hi Julia, >> >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: >> > These patches replace what appears to be a reference to the name of the >> > current function but is misspelled i

Re: [PATCH 0/20] fix misspelling of current function in string

2014-12-07 Thread Julia Lawall
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi Julia, > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > > These patches replace what appears to be a reference to the name of the > > current function but is misspelled in some way by either the name of the > > function itself, or by %s and

Re: [PATCH 0/20] fix misspelling of current function in string

2014-12-07 Thread Joe Perches
On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 20:20 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > These patches replace what appears to be a reference to the name of the > current function but is misspelled in some way by either the name of the > function itself, or by %s and then __func__ in an argument list. At least a few of these see

Re: [PATCH 0/20] fix misspelling of current function in string

2014-12-07 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi Julia, On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > These patches replace what appears to be a reference to the name of the > current function but is misspelled in some way by either the name of the > function itself, or by %s and then __func__ in an argument list. Would there be any

[PATCH 0/20] fix misspelling of current function in string

2014-12-07 Thread Julia Lawall
These patches replace what appears to be a reference to the name of the current function but is misspelled in some way by either the name of the function itself, or by %s and then __func__ in an argument list. // // sudo apt-get install python-pip // sudo pip install python-Levenshtein // spatch