On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 09:06:08PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Benjamin,
>
> > So please consider them for the next cycle. Or should I not have send
> > them in that case? Sorry, this step of the process was a bit unclear
> > to me.
>
> A fix is a fix. Applied the series to 5.3/scsi-fix
Benjamin,
> So please consider them for the next cycle. Or should I not have send
> them in that case? Sorry, this step of the process was a bit unclear
> to me.
A fix is a fix. Applied the series to 5.3/scsi-fixes. Thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Hello James and Martin,
here are some fixes for the zFCP device driver. I am rather certain this
won't fit into this rc-cycle anymore.. I just found these last week and
with internal reviews and tests I was regrettably not able to post these
any sooner.
So please consider them for the next cycle.
Steffen,
> here are 3 zfcp bug fixes for v5.1-rcX
Applied to 5.1/scsi-fixes, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
James, Martin,
here are 3 zfcp bug fixes for v5.1-rcX (or the next merge window).
The patches apply to Martin's 5.1/scsi-fixes
and to James' fixes branch.
Steffen Maier (3):
zfcp: fix rport unblock if deleted SCSI devices on Scsi_Host
zfcp: fix scsi_eh host reset with port_forced ERP for non-
> "Steffen" == Steffen Maier writes:
Steffen,
Steffen> here is a series of important zfcp fixes all marked for stable.
Steffen> They apply to the fixes branch of James' scsi.git or to
Steffen> v4.9-rc8.
Applied to 4.10/scsi-fixes.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To
Hi all,
here is a series of important zfcp fixes all marked for stable.
They apply to the fixes branch of James' scsi.git or to v4.9-rc8.
Patch 1 is the most important one since it fixes a panic
that can occur under certain circumstances.
Benjamin Block (1):
zfcp: fix use-after-"free" in FC in
7 matches
Mail list logo
