Re: [PATCH 6/7] cxlflash: Fix to avoid unnecessary scan with internal LUNs

2016-03-08 Thread Uma Krishnan
On 3/4/2016 3:55 PM, Uma Krishnan wrote: From: "Manoj N. Kumar" When switching to the internal LUN defined on the IBM CXL flash adapter, there is an unnecessary scan occurring on the second port. This scan leads to the following extra lines in the log: Dec 17

Re: [PATCH 6/7] cxlflash: Fix to avoid unnecessary scan with internal LUNs

2016-03-07 Thread Matthew R. Ochs
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Uma Krishnan wrote: > > From: "Manoj N. Kumar" > > When switching to the internal LUN defined on the > IBM CXL flash adapter, there is an unnecessary > scan occurring on the second port. This scan leads > to

[PATCH 6/7] cxlflash: Fix to avoid unnecessary scan with internal LUNs

2016-03-04 Thread Uma Krishnan
From: "Manoj N. Kumar" When switching to the internal LUN defined on the IBM CXL flash adapter, there is an unnecessary scan occurring on the second port. This scan leads to the following extra lines in the log: Dec 17 10:09:00 tul83p1 kernel: [ 3708.561134] cxlflash