On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 02:25:03PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
>
> On 04/19/2018 10:18 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:44:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 4/19/18 1:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 12:13 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Th
On 04/19/2018 10:18 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:44:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 4/19/18 1:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 12:13 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> Thanks for
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:44:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/19/18 1:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 12:13 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the test! Applied.
> >>
> >> Side note, it's unfo
On 4/19/18 1:13 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
>> Thanks for the test! Applied.
>
> Side note, it's unfortunate that this test takes 180 seconds to run only
> because we have to wait for the command timeout. We should be able to
> export r
On 4/19/18 1:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 12:13 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
>>> Thanks for the test! Applied.
>>
>> Side note, it's unfortunate that this test takes 180 seconds to run only
>> because we have
On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 12:13 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > Thanks for the test! Applied.
>
> Side note, it's unfortunate that this test takes 180 seconds to run only
> because we have to wait for the command timeout. We should be ab
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> Thanks for the test! Applied.
Side note, it's unfortunate that this test takes 180 seconds to run only
because we have to wait for the command timeout. We should be able to
export request_queue->rq_timeout writeable in sysfs. Would y
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:03:37AM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier
> ---
> tests/scsi/004 | 59
>
> tests/scsi/004.out |3 ++
> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 tests/
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N
Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier
---
tests/scsi/004 | 59
tests/scsi/004.out |3 ++
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 tests/scsi/004
create mode 100644 tests/scsi/004.out
diff --git a/tests/scsi/004 b
10 matches
Mail list logo