Re: [PATCH v2 10/38] cxlflash: Setup AFU PASID

2018-03-22 Thread Frederic Barrat
Le 26/02/2018 à 23:21, Uma Krishnan a écrit : Per the OCXL specification, the maximum PASID supported by the AFU is indicated by a field within the configuration space. Similar to acTags, implementations can choose to use any sub-range of PASID within their assigned range. For cxlflash, the

Re: [PATCH v2 10/38] cxlflash: Setup AFU PASID

2018-03-08 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 27/02/18 09:21, Uma Krishnan wrote: Per the OCXL specification, the maximum PASID supported by the AFU is indicated by a field within the configuration space. Similar to acTags, implementations can choose to use any sub-range of PASID within their assigned range. For cxlflash, the entire

[PATCH v2 10/38] cxlflash: Setup AFU PASID

2018-02-26 Thread Uma Krishnan
Per the OCXL specification, the maximum PASID supported by the AFU is indicated by a field within the configuration space. Similar to acTags, implementations can choose to use any sub-range of PASID within their assigned range. For cxlflash, the entire range is used. Signed-off-by: Uma Krishnan