On 14/07/2017 02:44, wangyijing wrote:
在 2017/7/14 0:10, John Garry 写道:
On 10/07/2017 08:06, Yijing Wang wrote:
Disco mutex was introudced to prevent domain rediscovery competing
with ata error handling(87c8331). If we have already hold the lock
in sas_revalidate_domain and sync executing
On 07/10/2017 09:06 AM, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Disco mutex was introudced to prevent domain rediscovery competing
> with ata error handling(87c8331). If we have already hold the lock
> in sas_revalidate_domain and sync executing probe, deadlock caused,
> because, sas_probe_sata() also need hold
在 2017/7/14 0:10, John Garry 写道:
> On 10/07/2017 08:06, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Disco mutex was introudced to prevent domain rediscovery competing
>> with ata error handling(87c8331). If we have already hold the lock
>> in sas_revalidate_domain and sync executing probe, deadlock caused,
>>
On 10/07/2017 08:06, Yijing Wang wrote:
Disco mutex was introudced to prevent domain rediscovery competing
with ata error handling(87c8331). If we have already hold the lock
in sas_revalidate_domain and sync executing probe, deadlock caused,
because, sas_probe_sata() also need hold disco_mutex.
Disco mutex was introudced to prevent domain rediscovery competing
with ata error handling(87c8331). If we have already hold the lock
in sas_revalidate_domain and sync executing probe, deadlock caused,
because, sas_probe_sata() also need hold disco_mutex. Since disco mutex
use to prevent
5 matches
Mail list logo
