On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:51 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:21:26AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I'm in two minds about printing the 'Device not ready' twice. On the
one hand, it's redundant information. On the other hand, it helps the
harried sysadmin with
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 09:08:46AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
The main thing I don't like is that we've spent a lot of time moving
sense prints into a library so that if someone gullible^Wsensible enough
to want to do a reporting infrastructure comes along, we have all the
entry points
Matthew == Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew After three weeks with no discussion, I guess it may as well
Matthew be applied.
Matthew scsi: Better error messages when device not ready
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin K. Petersen
3 matches
Mail list logo
