On Sat 22-03-14 02:43:20, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:32:16PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:29:09PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
I'll admit, though, that I don't really like having to fetch the 'has'
bits first to find out how large the rest of
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Sat 22-03-14 02:43:20, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:32:16PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:29:09PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
I'll admit, though, that I don't really like having to
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:32:16PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:29:09PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 03:54:37PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:44:10PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
I'm inclined to agree with
Darrick J. Wong darrick.w...@oracle.com writes:
This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
userspace to attach protection information (e.g. T10 DIF) data to a
disk write and to receive the information alongside a disk read. The
interface is an extension to the AIO
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:30:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
userspace to attach protection information (e.g. T10 DIF) data to a
disk write and to receive the information alongside a disk read. The
interface is an extension
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:57:31AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Darrick J. Wong darrick.w...@oracle.com writes:
This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
userspace to attach protection information (e.g. T10 DIF) data to a
disk write and to receive the information
Hi folks,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:23:32AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:30:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
userspace to attach protection information (e.g. T10 DIF) data to a
disk write and to
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:23:32AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:30:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
userspace to attach protection information (e.g. T10 DIF) data to a
disk write and to receive the
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:44:10PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
Hi folks,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:23:32AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:30:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
userspace to attach
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:39:59PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:57:31AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Darrick J. Wong darrick.w...@oracle.com writes:
This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
userspace to attach protection information (e.g.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 03:20:25PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:23:32AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:30:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
userspace to attach protection
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 03:54:37PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:44:10PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
I'm inclined to agree with Zach on this item. Ultimately, we need an
extensible data structure that can be grown without completely revising
the ABI as new
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:29:09PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 03:54:37PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:44:10PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
I'm inclined to agree with Zach on this item. Ultimately, we need an
extensible data structure
This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
userspace to attach protection information (e.g. T10 DIF) data to a
disk write and to receive the information alongside a disk read. The
interface is an extension to the AIO interface: two new commands
(IOCB_CMD_P{READ,WRITE}VM) are
14 matches
Mail list logo
