Re: Dynamic scsi_debug module

2014-02-07 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 16:36 -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 2/7/2014 3:46 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > The question is how much sense it makes to invest in scsi_debug now > > that we have the LIO target in the kernel? > > Thanks, I hadn't heard of this. It looks interesting, though a bit > c

Re: Dynamic scsi_debug module

2014-02-07 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/7/2014 3:46 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > The question is how much sense it makes to invest in scsi_debug now > that we have the LIO target in the kernel? Thanks, I hadn't heard of this. It looks interesting, though a bit complicated. -B

Re: Dynamic scsi_debug module

2014-02-07 Thread Martin K. Petersen
> "Phillip" == Phillip Susi writes: Phillip> Is it possible to use the scsi_debug module to create more than Phillip> one device? It seems to me that it needs rewritten to have an Phillip> interface to dynamically create devices and set their Phillip> parameters with a tool like losetup, rat

Dynamic scsi_debug module

2014-02-07 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is it possible to use the scsi_debug module to create more than one device? It seems to me that it needs rewritten to have an interface to dynamically create devices and set their parameters with a tool like losetup, rather than using module parameter