Re: Question: eh_abort_handler() and terminate commands

2013-05-25 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 05/25/2013 12:26 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote: On 5/24/2013 5:57 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: Which leads to the interesting question: What happens with the actual command once eh_abort_handler returns? Well, eventually it ends up on the done_q and gets returned up the stack via flush_don

Re: Question: eh_abort_handler() and terminate commands

2013-05-24 Thread Jeremy Linton
On 5/24/2013 5:57 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Which leads to the interesting question: What happens with the actual > command once eh_abort_handler returns? Well, eventually it ends up on the done_q and gets returned up the stack via flush_done_q(). But that wasn't what you were asking?

Question: eh_abort_handler() and terminate commands

2013-05-24 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Hi all, after having posted the first attempt for an updated FC error handler I found that the 'eh_abort_handler()' semantics are a bit odd. Obviously, the 'eh_abort_handler' is called to abort a command. But what _exactly_ is supposed to happen if it returns 'SUCCESS'? Initially one does expect