RE: [PATCH 3/4] pm8001: add a new spinlock to protect the CCB

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote: > On 06/27/2014 08:09 AM, Viswas G wrote: >> HI Tomas, >> >> This lock is not needed as we are already protecting the tag >> allocation and freeing with the pm8001_ha->lock. We are always acquiring >> this lock before calling pm8001_tag_alloc

Re: [PATCH 3/4] pm8001: add a new spinlock to protect the CCB

On 06/27/2014 08:09 AM, Viswas G wrote: > HI Tomas, > > This lock is not needed as we are already protecting the tag allocation and > freeing with the pm8001_ha->lock. We are always acquiring this lock before > calling > pm8001_tag_alloc(). > > We are allocating and freeing the tag in following

RE: [PATCH 3/4] pm8001: add a new spinlock to protect the CCB

HI Tomas, This lock is not needed as we are already protecting the tag allocation and freeing with the pm8001_ha->lock. We are always acquiring this lock before calling pm8001_tag_alloc(). We are allocating and freeing the tag in following paths, 1) Request/Response path : This we are protec