Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I think you misunderstood my point. megaraid does not produce a warning
about a missing return check when I compile it with gcc-3.4. Does it
warn for you? If not, why did you include it in the list?
I grepped the whole source tree and discared the locations where
in
On Monday, February 07, 2005 4:40 AM, Alex wrote:
is anything going to happen with the below listed locations?
(Some are part of the USB system, one is in block device, rest is SCSI.)
Note that a few locations do still lack the XXX comment.
I am asking because i am seeing ther respective
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:47:36AM -0500, Ju, Seokmann wrote:
On Monday, February 07, 2005 4:40 AM, Alex wrote:
is anything going to happen with the below listed locations?
(Some are part of the USB system, one is in block device, rest is SCSI.)
Note that a few locations do still lack the
On Monday, February 07, 2005 11:29 AM, Matthew wrote:
I don't get a warning from this line, using gcc 3.4.4 20041218
(prerelease)
(Debian 3.4.3-7):
drivers/scsi/megaraid.c: In function `megadev_ioctl':
drivers/scsi/megaraid.c:3626: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_to_user', declared
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 04:10:22PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I'm not sure why returning the result doesn't count as a use of the result
(in the case of megaraid).
From: Alexander Stohr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
./drivers/scsi/megaraid.c:4890: error = scsi_add_host(host,
5 matches
Mail list logo
