Hello, Todd.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:30:26PM -0800, Todd E Brandt wrote:
Ahh, sorry, yea I think async should work for the entire resume pathway. Would
you be willing to accept this ata patch separately from the scsi one? It
wouldn't provide any performance benefit on its own, but would
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 02:13:15PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 04:56:07PM -0800, Todd E Brandt wrote:
On resume, the ATA port driver currently waits until the AHCI controller
finishes executing the port wakeup command. This patch changes the
Is there anything
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 07:13:11PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/10/2014 06:11 PM, Brandt, Todd E wrote:
Yes yours is simpler, but it also opens a potential memory
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:55:44AM -0800, Todd E Brandt wrote:
I see your point, why have two paths if one will do. The only thing that
worries me is that the PM resume from hibernate function doesn't have
an error handler. What happens when it tries to read the image from swap
and the
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Todd E Brandt
todd.e.bra...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 07:13:11PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/10/2014 06:11 PM,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:30:07PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:55:44AM -0800, Todd E Brandt wrote:
I see your point, why have two paths if one will do. The only thing that
worries me is that the PM resume from hibernate function doesn't have
an error
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:37:01PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Todd E Brandt
todd.e.bra...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 07:13:11PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com wrote:
-BEGIN
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Todd E Brandt
todd.e.bra...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:37:01PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Todd E Brandt
Actually there's one other reason. In the ata_port_request_pm function it
checks to see if there's
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 04:56:07PM -0800, Todd E Brandt wrote:
On resume, the ATA port driver currently waits until the AHCI controller
finishes executing the port wakeup command. This patch changes the
Is there anything ahci specific about this? There shouldn't be.
This patch only
On Thursday, January 09, 2014 9:04 AM, Phillip Susi wrote:
I think my patch for this libata: resume in the background was a LOT
simpler. It just used the existing behavior of becoming async when
the async argument was !NULL, and fixed the one caller that didn't
actually care about the result
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/10/2014 06:11 PM, Brandt, Todd E wrote:
Yes yours is simpler, but it also opens a potential memory issue
by passing a static int as the return location for the error value.
I think it's just safer to tell the callback to attempt no return
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/7/2014 7:56 PM, Todd E Brandt wrote:
On resume, the ATA port driver currently waits until the AHCI
controller finishes executing the port wakeup command. This patch
changes the ata_port_resume callback to issue the wakeup and then
return
12 matches
Mail list logo
