Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] block: modify __bio_add_page check to accept pages that don't start a new segment

2013-08-01 Thread Jan Vesely
On Mon 25 Mar 2013 20:40:09 CET, Jens Axboe wrote: On Mon, Mar 25 2013, Jan Vesely wrote: 51506edc5741209311913 On Mon 25 Mar 2013 15:24:57 CET, Jens Axboe wrote: On Mon, Mar 25 2013, Jan Vesely wrote: v2: changed a comment The original behavior was to refuse all pages after the maximum

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] block: modify __bio_add_page check to accept pages that don't start a new segment

2013-03-25 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Mar 25 2013, Jan Vesely wrote: v2: changed a comment The original behavior was to refuse all pages after the maximum number of segments has been reached. However, some drivers (like st) craft their buffers to potentially require exactly max segments and multiple pages in the last

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] block: modify __bio_add_page check to accept pages that don't start a new segment

2013-03-25 Thread Jan Vesely
On Mon 25 Mar 2013 15:24:57 CET, Jens Axboe wrote: On Mon, Mar 25 2013, Jan Vesely wrote: v2: changed a comment The original behavior was to refuse all pages after the maximum number of segments has been reached. However, some drivers (like st) craft their buffers to potentially require

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] block: modify __bio_add_page check to accept pages that don't start a new segment

2013-03-25 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Mar 25 2013, Jan Vesely wrote: 51506edc5741209311913 On Mon 25 Mar 2013 15:24:57 CET, Jens Axboe wrote: On Mon, Mar 25 2013, Jan Vesely wrote: v2: changed a comment The original behavior was to refuse all pages after the maximum number of segments has been reached. However,