2015-01-21 0:20 GMT+09:00 Alan Stern :
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>
>> 2015-01-19 23:22 GMT+09:00 Tejun Heo :
>> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:05:58AM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> >> While accessing a scsi_device, the use count of the underlying LLDD
>> >> module is incremented. Th
Hello, Akinobu.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:57:37PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The reason I didn't move sht from the core driver to the LLDDs for
> fixing ufs and ums-* in the first place is to avoid exporting many
> symbols for callbacks in sht. But I realized that we can do it
> without that m
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2015-01-19 23:22 GMT+09:00 Tejun Heo :
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:05:58AM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> >> While accessing a scsi_device, the use count of the underlying LLDD
> >> module is incremented. The module reference is retrieved through
> >> .
2015-01-19 23:22 GMT+09:00 Tejun Heo :
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:05:58AM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> While accessing a scsi_device, the use count of the underlying LLDD
>> module is incremented. The module reference is retrieved through
>> .module field of struct scsi_host_template.
>>
>> Thi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:05:58AM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> While accessing a scsi_device, the use count of the underlying LLDD
> module is incremented. The module reference is retrieved through
> .module field of struct scsi_host_template.
>
> This mapping between scsi_device and underlying
5 matches
Mail list logo
