On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 19:50 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
I get the following:
SAH
SSH
SCB Q
SCB EXEC
SCB EXEC DONE
Actually, I suspect your issues should be fixed by this patch:
On 1/25/08, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I suspect your issues should be fixed by this patch:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e2d435ea4084022ab88efa74214accb45b1f9e92
Could you download 2.6.24 and try it out to see if they
I get the following:
SAH
SSH
SCB Q
SCB EXEC
SCB EXEC DONE
After ~3 secs the system freezes.
On Jan 22, 2008 12:20 AM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok my attempt to get the card failed so we are going to have to do this
the hard way. See where this patch crashes and what it prints
(On
Ok my attempt to get the card failed so we are going to have to do this
the hard way. See where this patch crashes and what it prints
(On top of the other patches)
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
linux.vanilla-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/scsi/initio.c
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 14:59 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:16:06 -0600
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 14:28 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On 1/11/08, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 14:28 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On 1/11/08, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:44 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 5:44 PM, James Bottomley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I havent reported initio: I/O
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:16:06 -0600
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 14:28 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On 1/11/08, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:44 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 5:44 PM,
On 1/11/08, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:44 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 5:44 PM, James Bottomley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I havent reported initio: I/O port range 0x0 is busy.
Sorry ... we appear to have several
On Jan 11, 2008 7:16 AM, James Bottomley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 02:18 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
First of all let me wish a happy new year.
I come back from the vacations and i compiled the initio driver with
#define DEBUG_INTERRUPT 1
#define
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 11:54 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 7:16 AM, James Bottomley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 02:18 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
First of all let me wish a happy new year.
I come back from the vacations and i compiled
On Jan 11, 2008 5:44 PM, James Bottomley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I havent reported initio: I/O port range 0x0 is busy.
Sorry ... we appear to have several reporters of different bugs in this
thread. That message was copied by Chuck Ebbert from a Red Hat
bugzilla ... I was assuming it was
On 01/11/2008 10:44 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
This proves the BAR0 to be non zero, but I also take it from your report
that the
initio: I/O port range 0x0 is busy.
message is also gone?
I havent reported initio: I/O port range 0x0 is busy.
Sorry ... we appear to have several reporters
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:44 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 5:44 PM, James Bottomley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I havent reported initio: I/O port range 0x0 is busy.
Sorry ... we appear to have several reporters of different bugs in this
thread. That message was
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 17:01 +, Alan Cox wrote:
Yes it works under 2.6.16.13. See the beginning of this thread, i
mention there some things about newer versions.
It worked (ish.. it has problems and always has had) before the big
updates, and according to my tester after the big
Yes it works under 2.6.16.13. See the beginning of this thread, i
mention there some things about newer versions.
It worked (ish.. it has problems and always has had) before the big
updates, and according to my tester after the big update + two patches
that escaped somewhere in the process.
Our reporter has applied patches since then and now reports the exact
same symptoms that Filippos does. (It just hangs after loading the driver.)
Can you add me to the cc of the Red Hat bug, or give me the #
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 02:18 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
First of all let me wish a happy new year.
I come back from the vacations and i compiled the initio driver with
#define DEBUG_INTERRUPT 1
#define DEBUG_QUEUE 1
#define DEBUG_STATE 1
#define INT_DISC1
I used
First of all let me wish a happy new year.
I come back from the vacations and i compiled the initio driver with
#define DEBUG_INTERRUPT 1
#define DEBUG_QUEUE 1
#define DEBUG_STATE 1
#define INT_DISC1
I used the sources from 2.6.24-rc6-git9 kernel. At kernel boot time the initio
On 12/19/2007 03:48 AM, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report.
If it still fails try to enable debugging by setting with patch [1]
these values at top of drivers/scsi/initio.c.
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:30 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 12/19/2007 03:48 AM, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report.
If it still fails try to enable debugging by setting
On 12/21/2007 04:03 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:30 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 12/19/2007 03:48 AM, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report.
If it
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 01:32:02AM -0800, Natalie Protasevich wrote:
The problem is that it appears to the casual observer as if they can
then add information to the bug through the web interface. But that
information will never be forwarded to the mailing list. Unless there's
a way of
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 01:32 -0800, Natalie Protasevich wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 9:05 AM, Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:50:40AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
So, to get the best of both worlds, file a bugzilla and note the bugid.
Then email a complete
On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report.
If it still fails try to enable debugging by setting with patch [1]
these values at top of drivers/scsi/initio.c. And send dmsgs.
Boaz
I tried patch[2] (addition
On Wed, Dec 19 2007 at 10:48 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report.
If it still fails try to enable debugging by setting with patch [1]
these values
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:48:27AM +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
Would it be better to open a bug report at bugzilla?
No, it wouldn't. Bugzilla is a place where bug reports go to be
ignored. Witness 9370 where despite my best efforts to move discussion
to the mailing list, it's been
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 06:29 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:48:27AM +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
Would it be better to open a bug report at bugzilla?
No, it wouldn't. Bugzilla is a place where bug reports go to be
ignored. Witness 9370 where despite my best
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:50:40AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
So, to get the best of both worlds, file a bugzilla and note the bugid.
Then email a complete report to the relevant list, but add [BUG bugid]
to the subject line and cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you do
this, bugzilla will keep track
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:39:47 +0200 Filippos Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have got an INITIO 9100 UW SCSI Controller with an IBM
IC35L036UWD210-0 scsi hard disk on a 32 bit x86 system.
Currently i have SUSE 10.1 (Kernel 2.6.16).
I tried to install OpenSUSE 10.3 (kernel
On Dec 17, 2007 1:18 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:39:47 +0200 Filippos Papadopoulos [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have got an INITIO 9100 UW SCSI Controller with an IBM
IC35L036UWD210-0 scsi hard disk on a 32 bit x86 system.
Currently i have SUSE
On Mon, Dec 17 2007 at 13:41 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:18 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:39:47 +0200 Filippos Papadopoulos [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have got an INITIO 9100 UW SCSI Controller with an IBM
On Mon, Dec 17 2007 at 14:18 +0200, Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17 2007 at 13:41 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:18 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:39:47 +0200 Filippos Papadopoulos [EMAIL
initio doesn't seem to have a maintainer...
Are you able to identify any earlier kernel which worked OK?
Maybe it's a new device? If you can get the `lspci -vvxx' output
for that device we can take a look.
If I remember rightly the fixes for this went into the scsi tree a couple
of
On Mon, Dec 17 2007 at 15:05 +0200, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
initio doesn't seem to have a maintainer...
Are you able to identify any earlier kernel which worked OK?
Maybe it's a new device? If you can get the `lspci -vvxx' output
for that device we can take a look.
If I
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:40:53 +0200
Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17 2007 at 15:05 +0200, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
initio doesn't seem to have a maintainer...
Are you able to identify any earlier kernel which worked OK?
Maybe it's a new device? If you can
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 14:36 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:40:53 +0200
Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17 2007 at 15:05 +0200, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
initio doesn't seem to have a maintainer...
Are you able to identify any earlier kernel
On Mon, Dec 17 2007 at 17:03 +0200, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 14:36 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:40:53 +0200
Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17 2007 at 15:05 +0200, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
initio doesn't seem
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:08:59PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Below fixes a deadly typo. Might as well be included in 2.6.24
You're sure ? scsi_for_each_sg includes a (sg)++ already...
scsi_for_each_sg(cmnd, sglist, cblk-sglen, i) {
sg-data =
On Mon, Dec 17 2007 at 18:20 +0200, Olivier Galibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:08:59PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Below fixes a deadly typo. Might as well be included in 2.6.24
You're sure ? scsi_for_each_sg includes a (sg)++ already...
39 matches
Mail list logo
