Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-15 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02 2007, Mike Christie wrote: >> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 03 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>>> From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg >>>> D

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:12:38 +0200 > On Tue, Apr 03 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg &g

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Apr 02 2007, Mike Christie wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > >> From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg > >> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:01:41 -0500 &g

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread Mike Christie
Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg >> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:01:41 -0500 >> >>> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 01:43 +0900, FUJITA Tomon

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, Apr 03 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg > Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:01:41 -0500 > > > On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 01:43 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > OK. I found an

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:01:41 -0500 > On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 01:43 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > OK. I found another bug in smp_test tool (sends bogus response buffer > > len to ker

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:45 -0400, James Smart wrote: > > James Bottomley wrote: > >> -- each SAS object (host, device, expander, etc) has the own bsg > >> device > > > > I think so; probably attached via the transport class. > > FYI - I understand the idea of a bsg device per object, but really

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread James Bottomley
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 01:43 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > OK. I found another bug in smp_test tool (sends bogus response buffer > len to kernel). I've uploaded a new patch: > > http://zaal.org/bsg/smp-test2.diff That sort of works; you have a final bug in that the manufacturer info response fra

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:27:47 +0900 > From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg > Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:02:01 -0500 > > &g

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:02:01 -0500 > On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 21:43 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > If you post the code, oth

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 21:43 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If you post the code, others who also have the hardware can try it > > too ... > > I've attached a patch against Jens' bsg tree and uploaed a patch > against the sgv4-tools tree: > > http://z

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread Douglas Gilbert
James Smart wrote: > > > James Bottomley wrote: >>> -- each SAS object (host, device, expander, etc) has the own bsg >>> device >> >> I think so; probably attached via the transport class. > > FYI - I understand the idea of a bsg device per object, but really, for > something that is used rarely

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread James Smart
James Bottomley wrote: -- each SAS object (host, device, expander, etc) has the own bsg device I think so; probably attached via the transport class. FYI - I understand the idea of a bsg device per object, but really, for something that is used rarely, it's a bunch of overhead. Objects, dat

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-02 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 22:57:42 -0500 > On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 11:49 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > I started to work on SMP pass through via bsg as a non-SCSI command > > experimenta

Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-01 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 11:49 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > I started to work on SMP pass through via bsg as a non-SCSI command > experimentation. I asked Doug to try the patch but it seems to take > some time to make Doug's hardware work with the mainline aic94xxx > driver. If you post the code,

SMP pass through interface via bsg

2007-04-01 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
I started to work on SMP pass through via bsg as a non-SCSI command experimentation. I asked Doug to try the patch but it seems to take some time to make Doug's hardware work with the mainline aic94xxx driver. Meanwhile, I'd like to discuss some issues. - user/kernel interface How should a user-s