RE: device support in hpsa, was: Re: OOPS from cciss_ioctl in 4.12+git

2017-07-10 Thread Don Brace
list ; linux- > bl...@vger.kernel.org; Don Brace ; Scott > Benesh ; Scott Teel > ; Kevin Barnett > ; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Hannes > Reinecke > Subject: Re: device support in hpsa, was: Re: OOPS from cciss_ioctl in > 4.12+git > > EXTERNAL EMAIL > > >

Re: device support in hpsa, was: Re: OOPS from cciss_ioctl in 4.12+git

2017-07-10 Thread Meelis Roos
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 11:42:38AM -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote: > > What happens when hpsa_allow_any=1 with the Smart Array 64xx > > It should probe. > > But only if it has a HP vendor ID as far as I can tell. We'd > still need to add the compaq ids so that these controllers get > probed. B

Re: device support in hpsa, was: Re: OOPS from cciss_ioctl in 4.12+git

2017-07-07 Thread Laurence Oberman
On 07/07/2017 02:08 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 11:42:38AM -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote: What happens when hpsa_allow_any=1 with the Smart Array 64xx It should probe. But only if it has a HP vendor ID as far as I can tell. We'd still need to add the compaq ids so

Re: device support in hpsa, was: Re: OOPS from cciss_ioctl in 4.12+git

2017-07-07 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 11:42:38AM -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote: > What happens when hpsa_allow_any=1 with the Smart Array 64xx > It should probe. But only if it has a HP vendor ID as far as I can tell. We'd still need to add the compaq ids so that these controllers get probed. But maybe it's