RE: device support in hpsa, was: Re: OOPS from cciss_ioctl in 4.12+git

So, adding adding hpsa_allow_any=1 did not work... When you added the 0x40800e11, did you add it to both tables? /* define the PCI info for the cards we can control */ static const struct pci_device_id hpsa_pci_device_id[] = { {PCI_VENDOR_ID_COMPAQ, PCI_DEVICE_ID_COMPAQ_CISSB, 0x0E11,

Re: device support in hpsa, was: Re: OOPS from cciss_ioctl in 4.12+git

> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 11:42:38AM -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote: > > What happens when hpsa_allow_any=1 with the Smart Array 64xx > > It should probe. > > But only if it has a HP vendor ID as far as I can tell. We'd > still need to add the compaq ids so that these controllers get > probed.

Re: device support in hpsa, was: Re: OOPS from cciss_ioctl in 4.12+git

On 07/07/2017 02:08 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 11:42:38AM -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote: What happens when hpsa_allow_any=1 with the Smart Array 64xx It should probe. But only if it has a HP vendor ID as far as I can tell. We'd still need to add the compaq ids so

Re: device support in hpsa, was: Re: OOPS from cciss_ioctl in 4.12+git

On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 11:42:38AM -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote: > What happens when hpsa_allow_any=1 with the Smart Array 64xx > It should probe. But only if it has a HP vendor ID as far as I can tell. We'd still need to add the compaq ids so that these controllers get probed. But maybe it's