On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:00:50PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> > I'm perfectly OK with taking it through the SCSI tree. Probably the
> > path of least resistance.
>
> Applied to 4.16/scsi-queue and rebased so it sits before Bart's patch.
Thank you! I have removed this patch from -rcu.
> I'm perfectly OK with taking it through the SCSI tree. Probably the
> path of least resistance.
Applied to 4.16/scsi-queue and rebased so it sits before Bart's patch.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Stephen,
>> I have to defer to you guys on that one. Left to myself, I will just
>> push it into the next merge window (as opposed to using my normal
>> process, which at this point would get it into the one following).
>>
>> So please let me know how you would like to proceed.
>
> Clearly, it
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 07:34:39AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:40:38 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:30:03PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > However, what's not clear to me is through which tree this patch should be
Hi all,
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:40:38 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney"
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:30:03PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > However, what's not clear to me is through which tree this patch should be
> > sent to Linus? Should the above patch be sent as a v4.15-rc fix or should
>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:30:03PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 20:42 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:25:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:59:30 + Bart Van Assche
> > > wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > commit cde4691a3
On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 20:42 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:25:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:59:30 + Bart Van Assche
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 14:57 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > After merging the scsi-mkp tree,
7 matches
Mail list logo
