On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 03:48:44PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 13:56 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
My theory is that the SWIOTLB is not full - it is just that the request
is for a compound page that is more than 512kB. Please note that
SWIOTLB highest chunk of
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 12:33 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 03:48:44PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 13:56 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
My theory is that the SWIOTLB is not full - it is just that the request
is for a compound page
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 13:56 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
My theory is that the SWIOTLB is not full - it is just that the request
is for a compound page that is more than 512kB. Please note that
SWIOTLB highest chunk of buffer it can deal
On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 13:56 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
My theory is that the SWIOTLB is not full - it is just that the request
is for a compound page that is more than 512kB. Please note that
SWIOTLB highest chunk of buffer it can deal with is 512kb.
And that is of course the
4 matches
Mail list logo