Olaf == Olaf Hering o...@aepfle.de writes:
Olaf Does that target code offer what scsi_debug offers, a bunch of
Olaf stuff listable with 'lsscsi'? The latter can be passed to
Olaf backstores/pscsi.
Yes.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Fri, Mar 06, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
I agree with Doug. The target code is much more comprehensive than
scsi_debug. You can set up file/disk/ram-backed SCSI LUNs on your
machine without the need for any hardware .
Does that target code offer what scsi_debug offers, a bunch of stuff
Olaf == Olaf Hering o...@aepfle.de writes:
Olaf On Thu, Mar 05, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
So it is possible. The stock answer has typically been that you
should probably be using the target subsystem for that. Thoughts?
Olaf Is the target subsystem capable of stacking? What I need for
Olaf
On Thu, Mar 05, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
So it is possible. The stock answer has typically been that
you should probably be using the target subsystem for that.
Thoughts?
Is the target subsystem capable of stacking? What I need for
xen-scsiback is a bunch of true SCSI devices. Due to lack of
On 15-03-05 10:33 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
I'm using scsi_debug to implement and test tools for xen-scsiback. Today
I discovered that each LUN uses the very same storage, as described in
the docs. What would it take to optionally use dedicated storage for
each LUN?
This is how I load scsi_debug:
I'm using scsi_debug to implement and test tools for xen-scsiback. Today
I discovered that each LUN uses the very same storage, as described in
the docs. What would it take to optionally use dedicated storage for
each LUN?
This is how I load scsi_debug:
modprobe scsi_debug add_host=4
6 matches
Mail list logo
