Hi,
I would like to announce the iSCSI enterprise target (IET) software,
which is open-source software to build iSCSI storage systems. It can
provide disk volumes to iSCSI initiators by using any kinds of files
(regular files, block devices, virtual block devices like RAID and
LVM, etc). The proje
Did anything change in the mpt fusion driver?
I'm seeing the same thing, again with mpt-fusion. 38MB/sec when it should
be getting >60.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:03:57 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4268] New: SCSI perfor
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 09:02 -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:57:39AM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 03:38 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 23:21 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Don't u
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:01:55PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch makes a needlessly global function static.
Thanks, committed
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsi
Updated patch:
<-- snip -->
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- remove the following unused functions:
- scsi.h: print_driverbyte
- scsi.h: print_hostbyte
- #if 0 the following unused functions:
- constants.c: scsi_print_hostbyte
- constant
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 12:01:55AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:25:09PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >...
> > > - constants.c: scsi_print_hostbyte
> > > - constants.c: scsi_print_driverbyte
> >
> > these we'll probably keep for now.
> >...
>
> keep = #if 0 ?
In
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:25:09PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>...
> > - constants.c: scsi_print_hostbyte
> > - constants.c: scsi_print_driverbyte
>
> these we'll probably keep for now.
>...
keep = #if 0 ?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly ou
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 22:44 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > James, please withdraw the patch above.
>
> Actually, I already have this in the tree. Could you just do an
> incremental to remove the blacklist line since I think the IBM people
> still want
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:31:59PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Before I'm getting flamed to death:
> This patch contains possible cleanups. If parts of this patch conflict
> with pending changes these parts of my patch have to be dropped.
>
> This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:00:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch #if 0's the following EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed but unused functions:
> - fc_target_block
> - fc_target_unblock
> - fc_host_block
> - fc_host_unblock
A driver using them is scheduled to be merged soon, and at least one
other will be
This patch makes a needlessly global function static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c |2 +-
drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.h |1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-full/drivers/scsi/sym53
This patch #if 0's the following EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed but unused functions:
- fc_target_block
- fc_target_unblock
- fc_host_block
- fc_host_unblock
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
If the inclusion of code using these functions into the kernel is
pending, please ignore my patch.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:35:29PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi Andries,
>
> your patch has many overlappings with a patch of mine aleady in -mm
> (both none of the two patches is a subset of the other one).
>
> Nowadays, working against -mm often avoids duplicate work.
>
> cu
> Adrian
As fa
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the following cleanups:
> - make needlessly global code static
As Christoph mentioned, the firmware images are auto-generated, so I'd
rather hold off on those deltas. Besides, I'm hoping in the near
future to drop the firmware from th
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:29:20PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch contains the following cleanups:
> > - make needlessly global code static
> > - kill the unused global *_version and *_version_str variables
> > in the
Before I'm getting flamed to death:
This patch contains possible cleanups. If parts of this patch conflict
with pending changes these parts of my patch have to be dropped.
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- remove or #if 0 the following unu
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 22:44 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> James, please withdraw the patch above.
Actually, I already have this in the tree. Could you just do an
incremental to remove the blacklist line since I think the IBM people
still want their shark fix?
Thanks,
James
-
To unsubscribe from
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the following cleanups:
> - make needlessly global code static
> - kill the unused global *_version and *_version_str variables
> in the firmware files
The firmware files are generated, so it'd be better to leave
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 16:11 +0900, Yokota Hiroshi wrote:
> + if (data->CurrentSC != NULL) {
> + nsp_msg(KERN_WARNING, "CurrentSC!=NULL this can't be happen");
> SCpnt->result = DID_BAD_TARGET << 16;
> nsp_scsi_done(SCpnt);
> - return 0;
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- remove or #if 0 the following unused finctions:
- tul_pop_pend_scb
- tul_device_reset
- tul_reset_scsi_bus
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/initio.c | 85 +--
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- kill the unused global *_version and *_version_str variables
in the firmware files
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/ql2100.c |2
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/ql2100_fw.c
This patch makes needlessly global code static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/pas16.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-full/drivers/scsi/pas16.c.old 2005-02-28
19:37:31.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11
This patch makes needlessly global code static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/osst.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-full/drivers/scsi/osst.c.old 2005-02-28
19:36:05.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4
This patch makes a needlessly global struct static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-full/drivers/scsi/ch.c.old 2005-02-28
18:14:48.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-full/drivers/scsi/ch.c 2005-02-28 18:14:55.0
+0100
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make some needlessly global functions static
- remove one more kernel 2.2 #ifdef
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/gdth.c | 24
drivers/scsi/gdth.h | 41 -
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:46:00 -0500, Dave Wysochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AJ Lewis wrote:
>
> > "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The following is the first public release of the PyX Technologies iSCSI
> > > Initiator Core Stack v1.6.1.20 for Linux 2.6.11-rc4.
Andre Hedrick wrote:
Hi Dave,
If the NetAPP target is misconfigured, why would it even allow any
unknown
initiator to go beyond discovery session? It appears that a
semi-successful lun scan has happened or am mis reading the report?
I think you're misreading the report and/or don't understand ho
I approve this, please apply to kernel.org branch.
Second time this has been submitted, been integrated since November 24th
in 1.1.5-2370 of the Adaptec Branch of the driver.
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adria
Hi Dave,
If the NetAPP target is misconfigured, why would it even allow any unknown
initiator to go beyond discovery session? It appears that a
semi-successful lun scan has happened or am mis reading the report?
If I read deeper into your comments, does the target support ACL's?
If yes, then ho
29 matches
Mail list logo
