On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report.
If it still fails try to enable debugging by setting with patch [1]
these values at top of drivers/scsi/initio.c. And send dmsgs.
Boaz
I tried patch[2] (addition
On Wed, Dec 19 2007 at 10:48 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report.
If it still fails try to enable debugging by setting with patch [1]
these values
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:48:27AM +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
Would it be better to open a bug report at bugzilla?
No, it wouldn't. Bugzilla is a place where bug reports go to be
ignored. Witness 9370 where despite my best efforts to move discussion
to the mailing list, it's been
This patch series is a sequence of late arriving bug fixes, mainly in
drivers but also one debugging scatterlist BUG_ON() in the tape ULD.
The initio bug fixes are definitely required, we just don't have
confirmation that they're the whole fix yet, so an additional fix for
initio may be necessary.
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 06:29 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:48:27AM +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
Would it be better to open a bug report at bugzilla?
No, it wouldn't. Bugzilla is a place where bug reports go to be
ignored. Witness 9370 where despite my best
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:50:40AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
So, to get the best of both worlds, file a bugzilla and note the bugid.
Then email a complete report to the relevant list, but add [BUG bugid]
to the subject line and cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you do
this, bugzilla will keep track
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:27:49AM +0530, Saquib Imam wrote:
In which case EWOULDBLOCK / EAGAIN is set while a write operation ?
From write(2):
ERRORS
EAGAIN Non-blocking I/O has been selected using O_NONBLOCK and the
write would block.
Erik
--
They're all fools.
On Tue, Dec 18 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:44:40AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
Hi,
This is just an idea I had, which might make request processing a little
bit cheaper depending on queue behaviour. For example if it is
Doug pointed out that SMP passthrough support via bsg doesn't update
din_resid or dout_resid. It's confusing for user-space tools like
smp_utils.
This patch fixes mptsas_smp_handler (for sas fusion) and libsas'
sas_smp_handler to update both din_resid or dout_resid on success.
Signed-off-by:
On Dec 20, 2007 1:44 PM, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
+++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
@@ -1343,6 +1343,8 @@ static int mptsas_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
struct sas_rphy *rphy,
smprep = (SmpPassthroughReply_t
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:13:15 +1100
Julian Calaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 1:44 PM, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
+++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
@@ -1343,6 +1343,8 @@ static int mptsas_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host
On Dec 20, 2007 2:20 PM, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:13:15 +1100
Julian Calaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 1:44 PM, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
+++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
OK, some fixes since last time, as I wade through more SCSI drivers. Some
drivers use use_sg as a flag to know whether the request_buffer is a
scatterlist: I don't need the counter, but I still need the flag, so I fixed
that in a more intuitive way (an explicit -sg pointer in the cmd).
Also,
(Updates since last time: const-safe iterators and sg_ring_num helper for
counting scatterlist entries across entire ring).
This patch introduces 'struct sg_ring', a layer on top of scatterlist
arrays. It meshes nicely with routines which expect a simple array of
'struct scatterlist' because it
Obvious counterpart to dma_map_sg. Note that this is arch-independent
code; sg_rings are backwards compatible with simple sg arrays.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/base/dma-mapping.c | 13 +
include/linux/dma-mapping.h |4
2 files changed, 17
Obvious counterpart to blk_rq_map_sg.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/block/ll_rw_blk.c b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
--- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c
+++ b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include linux/blktrace_api.h
#include linux/fault-inject.h
#include linux/scatterlist.h
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:49:30 +1100
Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obvious counterpart to dma_map_sg. Note that this is arch-independent
code; sg_rings are backwards compatible with simple sg arrays.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/base/dma-mapping.c |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:45:18 +1100
Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, some fixes since last time, as I wade through more SCSI drivers. Some
drivers use use_sg as a flag to know whether the request_buffer is a
scatterlist: I don't need the counter, but I still need the flag, so I
Hi Alan,
Was looking through initio.c to convert it to sg_ring, and noticed this
code:
initio_build_scb() around 2616:
sg = cblk-sglist[0];
scsi_for_each_sg(cmnd, sglist, cblk-sglen, i) {
sg-data =
On Thu, Dec 20 2007 at 9:22 +0200, Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alan,
Was looking through initio.c to convert it to sg_ring, and noticed this
code:
initio_build_scb() around 2616:
sg = cblk-sglist[0];
scsi_for_each_sg(cmnd, sglist,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:22:54 +1100
Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alan,
Was looking through initio.c to convert it to sg_ring, and noticed this
code:
initio_build_scb() around 2616:
sg = cblk-sglist[0];
scsi_for_each_sg(cmnd, sglist,
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:06:31 +0900
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:49:30 +1100
Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/**
+ * dma_map_sg_ring - Map an entire sg ring
+ * @dev: Device to free noncoherent memory for
+ * @sg: The sg_ring
+ *
22 matches
Mail list logo
