On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 18:10 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:55:45 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9674
Summary: Oops during rmmod'ing modeuls
Actually, the correct mailing list is linux-ide. Alan Cox began working
on the driver. Cc'ing both.
Unless I get further info from Initio I don't expect anything to happen.
They simply don't provide enough info to write a driver.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 13:21 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 18:10 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:55:45 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 10:49 -0500, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:24 -0600:
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 18:10 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:55:45 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A recent bug report:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9674
Was caused because the ULDs now set their own prep functions, but don't
necessarily reset the prep function back to the SCSI default when they
are removed. This leads to panics if commands are sent to the device
after the
Hi,
I complained about this before, but always got ignored. Please not this time.
I can presently reliably reproduce it as often as I want.
Pretty please, I can't keep this state forever, since the system is presently
going into production.
As far as I can remotely see, IOC0 and IOC1 are on
On Wednesday, January 02, 2008 11:54 AM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
I complained about this before, but always got ignored.
Please not this time.
Sorry, I didn't see your email before today.
On IOC0 there is 2:0:4:0 and on IOC1 there is 3:0:13:0 and 3:0:14:0.
pfs1n14-m:~# /tmp/scsiadd -a 2
Use mutex instead of semaphore in struct class.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/hosts.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -upr linux/drivers/scsi/hosts.c linux.new/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
--- linux/drivers/scsi/hosts.c 2007-12-28
OK, after wading through many scsi drivers, I decided to change tack and try
to provide a transition path. This is in two stages:
1) These two patches. sg_ring used underneath, but if any driver asks for
scsi_sglist() they get a 2.6.24-style chained sg. No other patches are
necessary.
2)
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:06:09AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:50:20PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Convert semaphore to mutex in struct class.
...
One lockdep warning detected as following, thus use mutex_lock_nested with
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING in class_device_add
On Jan 3, 2008 3:24 PM, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:06:09AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:50:20PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Convert semaphore to mutex in struct class.
...
One lockdep warning detected as following, thus
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:21:36PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
...
I don't know if there's other possible warning places with this mutex
or not, if you have any ideas about this, please tell me.
I think lockdep is just to tell such things. So, the question is, how
much it was tested already,
12 matches
Mail list logo
