CC [M] drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.o
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function ‘lpfc_pci_probe_one’:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:1897: error: implicit declaration of function
‘pci_enable_device_bars’
make[6]: *** [drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.o] Error 1
seen on both x86 archs.
-
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:34 -0600:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 09:38 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 12:32 AM, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iSER has parameters to limit the maximum size of RDMA (it needs to
repeat RDMA with a poor
Ingo Molnar wrote:
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ lpfc_pci_probe_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
uint16_t iotag;
int bars =
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 15:36 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
CC [M] drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.o
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function ‘lpfc_pci_probe_one’:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:1897: error: implicit declaration of function
‘pci_enable_device_bars’
make[6]: ***
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 10:51 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ lpfc_pci_probe_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
* Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ lpfc_pci_probe_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
uint16_t
Ingo Molnar wrote:
it would have been totally appropriate for me to just send a mail to
lkml with the proper subject line about the breakage. (I might even have
decided to stay completely silent about the issue and fix it for my own
build, letting you guys figure it out.)
Oh come on... You
* Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
it would have been totally appropriate for me to just send a mail to lkml
with the proper subject line about the breakage. (I might even have
decided to stay completely silent about the issue and fix it for my own
build, letting
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 18:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -1894,7 +1894,7
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
it would have been totally appropriate for me to just send a mail to lkml
with the proper subject line about the breakage. (I might even have
decided to stay completely silent about the issue and fix it for my own
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:43:54PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
Hi Greg,
Given your recent call for review of the next 2.6.22-stable I'd
appreciate it if you and the rest of the stable team would strongly
consider this SCSI IO error propagation fix for inclusion in 2.6.22.17
(as well as the
Ingo Molnar wrote:
so please tell me Jeff. If Greg, who is the super-maintainer of your
code area, and who deals with your code every day and changes it every
minute and hour, simply did not Cc: the SCSI list - how am i, a largely
outside party in this matter, supposed to notice that 3
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:56:30PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008 3:24 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:43:54PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
Hi Greg,
Given your recent call for review of the next 2.6.22-stable I'd
appreciate it if you and the
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 12:03 -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
This patch fixes a problem with some out-of-spec SCSI disks that report
hardware or medium errors incorrectly. Without the patch, the kernel
may silently ignore a failed write command or return corrupted data on a
failed read command.
I wrote on 2008-01-13:
James Bottomley wrote:
Firewire list cc'd
Jan 12 16:50:49 x3400 kernel: firewire_sbp2: orb reply timed out, rcode=0x11
Jan 12 16:50:49 x3400 kernel: sd 11:0:0:0: [sdc] Result:
hostbyte=DID_BUS_BUSY
driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK
Best I can tell, this is the source
15 matches
Mail list logo
