On Friday 21 September 2012 23:18:27 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Now, James says he doesn't like the way ready_to_power_off is used. Sure
enough, it is totally irrelevant to the majority of SCSI devices. It actually
is totally irrelevant to everything in the SCSI subsystem except for the sr
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 15:15 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Jens Axboe ax...@kernel.dk wrote:
On 2012-08-30 14:06, Yi Zou wrote:
[
Jens/James,
This is a rather old rate limt patch but never gets picked up in upstream,
so I
am resending it here as v3,
On Saturday, September 22, 2012, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Friday 21 September 2012 23:18:27 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Now, James says he doesn't like the way ready_to_power_off is used. Sure
enough, it is totally irrelevant to the majority of SCSI devices. It
actually
is totally
Hi Borislav!
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:23:45 +0200, Borislav Petkov b...@amd64.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:58:25PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Here's the script, let me know how it goes:
Here's a more correct version. I'm not saying yours won't work based
on the rdmsr and setpci
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
There are sd devices with removable media.
OK. Does the SCSI layer distinguish them from devices without removable
media?
Yes, it does. struct scsi_device has a .removable member, and the
Removable flag is part of the response data to the
On Saturday, September 22, 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
There are sd devices with removable media.
OK. Does the SCSI layer distinguish them from devices without removable
media?
Yes, it does. struct scsi_device has a .removable member,
I can't get the SES device on my MPT controller to show up in Linux as
a sg device.
The controller is a re-flashed IBM BR10i (LSISAS1068E), running the
latest firmware and it is connected
to the SES capable backplane via i2c on the SFF-8087 sidebands.
Bios post as follows:
SLOT ID LUN
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I see. So the sr's runtime suspend may be useful even without the
power-off
feature, right?
Exactly. Even though the drive itself may not be powered off, by
putting it into runtime suspend we gain the ability to suspend the
On Saturday, September 22, 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I see. So the sr's runtime suspend may be useful even without the
power-off
feature, right?
Exactly. Even though the drive itself may not be powered off, by
putting it into
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 13:57 +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
In case of error, the function target_fabric_configfs_init() returns
ERR_PTR() not NULL pointer. The NULL test in the return value check
should be replaced with IS_ERR().
dpatch engine is
10 matches
Mail list logo