On 09/24/12 20:52, Robert Love wrote:
In LUN RESET testing involving NetApp targets, it is observed that LUN
RESET is failing. The fc_fcp_resp() is not completing the completiong
It looks like there is a typo in the patch description (in the last word
of the second line) ?
Bart.
--
To
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:40:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
And I'd add a comment about the next poll.
This appears somewhat racy, though, because in theory a media
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:46:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:06:11PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
need_eject:
First consider how the device will be
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:21 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On 09/25/2012 12:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 17:00 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
drivers/scsi/sd.c |4
drivers/scsi/sd.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I'm not opposed
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:18 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
A example patch would be something like the following, I didn't seperate
these ACPI calls in sr.c as this is just a concept proof, if this is the
right thing to do, I will separate them into another file sr-acpi.c and
make empty stubs for them
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:40:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
And I'd add a comment about the next poll.
This
Compiling aic94xx_sds.o (part of the aic94xx driver) triggers this GCC
warning:
drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c: In function 'asd_read_flash':
drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c:597:21: warning: 'offs' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:02:29PM +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:18 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
A example patch would be something like the following, I didn't seperate
these ACPI calls in sr.c as this is just a concept proof, if this is the
right thing to do, I will
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I'm thinking of enabling this GPE in sr_suspend once we decided that it
is ready to be powered off, so the time frame between sr_suspend and
when the power is actually removed
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I'm thinking of enabling this GPE in sr_suspend once we decided that it
is ready to be powered off, so the time frame
On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I'm thinking of enabling this GPE in sr_suspend once we decided that it
is
On 08/09/12 17:41, Bart Van Assche wrote:
[ ... ]
Hello Dave,
More than six weeks have elapsed since I posted version four of this
patch series. It would be appreciated if you could tell me when review
comments for this patch series will be posted. I'd also like to remind
you that some
Using /dev/sg for scanners is blocked from unprivileged users. Reimplement
this using customizable command filters, so that the sysfs knobs will work
in this case too.
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
---
v1-v2: OOM check [Alan Cox]
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:26:00AM +0300, Adrian Sandu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Sarah Sharp
sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Ok, so 3.4.11 doesn't work, and the log file was from 3.5.
If you want I can provide a 3.4 log...
Hmm, does a 3.3 stable kernel work for you? I
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I'm thinking of enabling
Cc: Lukasz Dorau lukasz.do...@intel.com
Cc: Maciej Patelczyk maciej.patelc...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang dave.ji...@intel.com
---
MAINTAINERS |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index b17587d..162f602 100644
---
microcode sg xhci_hcd button ext3 jbd mbcache sd_mod crc_t10dif\
elper cryptd lrw aes_x86_64 xts gf128mul ahci libahci pata_acpi ata_generic
dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
CPU 0
Pid: 753, comm: fsck.ext3 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc7-next-20120925+ #4
/DQ67SW
RIP: 0010
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On
18 matches
Mail list logo
