On Nov 11 Stefan Richter wrote:
On Nov 09 Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
I recommend broadening this patch. T10 is discussing making READ (10),
WRITE (10), etc. obsolete in SBC-4 in favor of their 16-byte CDB
counterparts.
The algorithm should be:
1. During discovery,
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:33 +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
wrote:
I recommend broadening this patch. T10 is discussing making READ
(10), WRITE (10), etc. obsolete in SBC-4 in favor of their 16-byte CDB
counterparts.
The algorithm should be:
1. During discovery, determine if
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
index 13b8bcd..6ff785e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
@@ -251,6 +251,11 @@ static int slave_configure(struct
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:15:02AM -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
Andy's initial email ended with the request: Please explain. Thus,
Andy's email seemed designed to seek facts, which I think is a
reasonable and good thing to do here. Meanwhile, the facts *still*
aren't clear here yet.
...
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:08:43 -0500
Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:15:02AM -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
Andy's initial email ended with the request: Please explain. Thus,
Andy's email seemed designed to seek facts, which I think is a
reasonable and good
Lawrence Rosen wrote at 17:13 (EST) on Sunday:
First, I hope that we can tone down the arguments about whether the
use of Linux APIs and headers automatically turns a program into a
derivative work of Linux. I think that argument has been largely
debunked in the U.S. in the recent decision in
Il 12/11/2012 12:33, James Bottomley ha scritto:
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
index 13b8bcd..6ff785e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
@@
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 12/11/2012 12:33, James Bottomley ha scritto:
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
index 13b8bcd..6ff785e 100644
---
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:31 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 12/11/2012 12:33, James Bottomley ha scritto:
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
index 13b8bcd..6ff785e 100644
---
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:10 AM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:31 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 12/11/2012 12:33, James Bottomley ha scritto:
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
diff --git
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 10:01 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
Any reason not to do this always on 2TB drives, which basically means
changing this:
- } else if (block 0x) {
+ } else if (sdkp-capacity 0x) {
and nothing else?
This was the intent of my patch,
Il 12/11/2012 16:10, James Bottomley ha scritto:
Actually it only turns it on for large capacity drives, as said in the
comment. sdp-force_read_16 only matters for 2TB drives:
If you follow the discussion, we'll need to turn it on for some drives
regardless of size.
Even if the two
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 12/11/2012 16:10, James Bottomley ha scritto:
Actually it only turns it on for large capacity drives, as said in the
comment. sdp-force_read_16 only matters for 2TB drives:
If you follow the discussion, we'll need to turn it on for some
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:55PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
void ata_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev)
{
+ if (zpodd_dev_enabled(dev))
+ zpodd_deinit(dev);
Maybe zpodd_exit() instead?
+void zpodd_init(struct ata_device *dev)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct zpodd
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:56PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
Since the ata acpi notification code introduced in commit
3bd46600a7a7e938c54df8cdbac9910668c7dfb0 is solely for ZPODD, and we
now have a dedicated place for it, move these code there.
And the add/remove_pm_notifier code is simplified
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:57PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
The atapi_eh_tur and atapi_eh_request_sense can be reused by ZPODD
code, so separate them out to a file named libata-atapi.c, and the
Makefile is modified accordingly. No functional changes should result
from this commit.
Why is this
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:58PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
@@ -784,7 +784,13 @@ static int ata_acpi_push_id(struct ata_device *dev)
*/
int ata_acpi_on_suspend(struct ata_port *ap)
{
- /* nada */
+ struct ata_device *dev;
+
+ ata_for_each_dev(dev, ap-link, ENABLED) {
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:59PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
A new interface to block disk events is added, this interface is
meant to eliminate a race between PM runtime callback and disk events
checking.
Suppose the following device tree:
device_sata_port (the parent)
device_ODD
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:59PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
A new interface to block disk events is added, this interface is
meant to eliminate a race between PM runtime callback and disk events
checking.
Suppose the following device tree:
Hello, Alan.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:18:11PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
Weren't you gonna do something different about this? I mean, if sr
knows that autopm kicked in, it can simply tell the block layer that
nothing is going on. Wouldn't that be simpler?
It wouldn't work for non-ZP
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Alan.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:18:11PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
Weren't you gonna do something different about this? I mean, if sr
knows that autopm kicked in, it can simply tell the block layer that
nothing is going on. Wouldn't that
Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org writes:
On 11/09/12 21:46, Jeff Moyer wrote:
On 11/06/12 16:41, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
It's certainly better to tie them all to one node then let them be
randomly scattered across nodes; your 6% observation may simply be
from that.
How do
What do these commands report about the NUMA and non-uniform IO topology on the
test system?
numactl --hardware
lspci -t
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Moyer [mailto:jmo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, 12 November, 2012 3:27 PM
To: Bart Van Assche
Cc: Elliott, Robert
23 matches
Mail list logo
