Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] Support 64-bit LUNs

2014-06-11 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 06/10/2014 07:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 06/03/14 10:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote: this patchset updates the SCSI stack to support full 64-bit LUNs. The first patch is a simple fix; the next patch updates the sequential scan logic to be compliant with SPC. The third patch addresses a

Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] Support 64-bit LUNs

2014-06-11 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 06/11/14 08:34, Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 06/10/2014 07:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: Many SCSI LLD's use int_to_scsilun() in the hot path (queuecommand()). This patch series makes the int_to_scsilun() function slightly more expensive. Has it been considered to cache the result of

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] TARGET/sbc,loopback: Adjust command data length in case pi exists on the wire

2014-06-11 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 6/11/2014 12:17 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: SNIP QT Instead of using existing value within cmd-data_length, can we calculated data_length based on secstors blocksize. cmd-data_length = sectors * dev-dev_attrib.block_size; We can do that I suppose... Although it seems weird that the core

Re: [PATCH-v2 0/6] vhost/scsi: Add T10 PI SGL passthrough support

2014-06-11 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 02:20:28PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:56 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote: That would work, or I can simply include a pointer to Stephen's patch in

[PATCH v2 2/3] libiscsi, iser: Adjust data_length to include protection information

2014-06-11 Thread Sagi Grimberg
In case protection information exists over the wire iscsi header data length is required to include it. Use protection information aware scsi helpers to set the correct transfer length. In order to avoid breakage, remove iser transfer length checks for each task as they are not always true and

[PATCH v2 0/3] Include protection information in transport header

2014-06-11 Thread Sagi Grimberg
At the SCSI transport level, there is no distinction between user data and protection information. Thus, iscsi header field expected data transfer length should include protection information. Patch #1 introduces scsi helper scsi_transfer_length which computes wire transfer byte count. Patch #2

[PATCH v2 1/3] scsi_cmnd: Introduce scsi_transfer_length helper

2014-06-11 Thread Sagi Grimberg
In case protection information exists on the wire scsi transports should include it in the transfer byte count (even if protection information does not exist in the host memory space). This helper will compute the total transfer length from the scsi command data length and protection attributes.

[PATCH v2 3/3] TARGET/sbc,loopback: Adjust command data length in case pi exists on the wire

2014-06-11 Thread Sagi Grimberg
In various areas of the code, it is assumed that se_cmd-data_length describes pure data. In case that protection information exists over the wire (protect bits is are on) the target core re-calculates the data length from the CDB and the backed device block size (instead of each transport peeking

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
After this first pull for the 3.16 merge window it seems like this worked out fairly well - we got a large number of patches in, and all reviewed by a second pair of eyes. How should we go on from this? The drivers-for-3.16-2 branch, which had the late lpfs and hpsa updates didn't make it into

Re: [PATCH v2] notify block layer when using temporary change to cache_type

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 05:37:30PM +0800, Vaughan Cao wrote: This is a fix for commit: 39c60a0948cc06139e2fbfe084f83cb7e7deae3b sd: fix array cache flushing bug causing performance problems We must notify the block layer via q-flush_flags after temporary change the cache_type to write

Re: [PATCH] sd: bad return code of init_sd

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 linux-scsi-ml] linux-firmware: qla2xxx: Update ql2{4,5}00_fw.bin to version 7.03.00

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:00:39PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: resent to linux-scsi-ml, without the binary blob(244K). Firmwares were taken from http://ldriver.qlogic.com/firmware/ Looks good, while there's nothing really to review for a firmware blob update, can you get me a review or

Re: [PATCH 1/4] [SCSI] Don't build AdvanSys on ARM

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 2/4] [SCSI] pas16: don't call free_dma()

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:29:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The pas16 scsi driver does not use DMA, and the call to free_dma() in its exit function seems to have been copied incorrectly from another driver but never caused trouble. One case where it gets in the way is randconfig builds on

Re: [PATCH 3/4] [SCSI] qlogicfas: don't call free_dma()

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:29:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The qlogicfas scsi driver does not use DMA, and the call to free_dma() in its exit function seems to have been copied incorrectly from another driver but never caused trouble. One case where it gets in the way is randconfig

Re: [PATCH 4/4] [SCSI] NCR53c406a: don't call free_dma() by default

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:29:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The NCR53c406a scsi driver normally does not use DMA, unless the USE_PIO macro is disabled by modifying the source code. The call to free_dma() for some reason uses #ifdef USE_DMA, which does not do the right thing, since USE_DMA

Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] virtio-scsi: avoid cancelling uninitialized work items

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Can I get a second review on this one from anyone? On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:34:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Calling the workqueue interface on uninitialized work items isn't a good idea even if they're zeroed. It's not failing catastrophically only through happy accidents.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: Handle power-on reset unit attention

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: As per SAM there is a status precedence, with any sense code 29/XX taking second place just after an ACA ACTIVE status. Additionally, each target might prefer to not queue any unit attention conditions but just report one. Due

Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] virtio-scsi: avoid cancelling uninitialized work items

2014-06-11 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:53:46PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Messaggio originale From: Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org To: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, h...@lst.de, jbottom...@parallels.com,

Re: SCSI eats error from flush failure during hot plug

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:29:06AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: I'll do it as a bug fix, but I do need Jens to make sure nothing else breaks first. Best I can tell, the state model for compound commands like flush doesn't expect us to change the request type ... nothing puts it back to

[PULL] vhost: infrastructure changes for 3.16

2014-06-11 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Hi Linus, Please pull the following. Please note this needs to be merged before merging target-pending PULL which Nicholas will be sending out shortly. Thanks! The following changes since commit 1860e379875dfe7271c649058aeddffe5afd9d0d: Linux 3.15 (2014-06-08 11:19:54 -0700) are available in

Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] Support 64-bit LUNs

2014-06-11 Thread Douglas Gilbert
On 14-06-11 02:53 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 06/11/14 08:34, Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 06/10/2014 07:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: Many SCSI LLD's use int_to_scsilun() in the hot path (queuecommand()). This patch series makes the int_to_scsilun() function slightly more expensive. Has it

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi_scan: Send TEST UNIT READY to the LUN before scanning

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:26:42AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: REPORT_LUN_SCAN does not report any outstanding unit attention condition as per SAM. However, the target might not be fully initialized at that time, so we might end up getting a default entry (or even a partially filled one).

Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: Handle power-on reset unit attention

2014-06-11 Thread Ewan Milne
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 09:26 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: As per SAM there is a status precedence, with any sense code 29/XX taking second place just after an ACA ACTIVE status. Additionally, each target might prefer to not queue any unit attention conditions but just report one. Due to the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree

2014-06-11 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 05:01 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: After this first pull for the 3.16 merge window it seems like this worked out fairly well - we got a large number of patches in, and all reviewed by a second pair of eyes. How should we go on from this? The drivers-for-3.16-2

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi_scan: Send TEST UNIT READY to the LUN before scanning

2014-06-11 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 09:26 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: REPORT_LUN_SCAN does not report any outstanding unit attention condition as per SAM. However, the target might not be fully initialized at that time, so we might end up getting a default entry (or even a partially filled one). But as

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:17:34AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: No, I was waiting to check if there was any reason to have them split, but I think we've scope today or tomorrow. The only other outstanding thing is the fsync bug fix, which is waiting Jens' investigation of the block issues

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi_scan: Send TEST UNIT READY to the LUN before scanning

2014-06-11 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 06/11/2014 04:24 PM, James Bottomley wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 09:26 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: REPORT_LUN_SCAN does not report any outstanding unit attention condition as per SAM. However, the target might not be fully initialized at that time, so we might end up getting a default

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi_scan: Send TEST UNIT READY to the LUN before scanning

2014-06-11 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:33 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 06/11/2014 04:24 PM, James Bottomley wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 09:26 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: REPORT_LUN_SCAN does not report any outstanding unit attention condition as per SAM. However, the target might not be fully

Re: [PATCH v2] sg: add SG_FLAG_Q_AT_TAIL flag

2014-06-11 Thread Ewan Milne
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 10:58 -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote: When the SG_IO ioctl was copied into the block layer and later into the bsg driver, subtle differences emerged. One difference is the way injected commands are queued through the block layer (i.e. this is not SCSI device queueing nor

Re: [PATCH 01/14] block: Get rid of bdev_integrity_enabled()

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:35PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: bdev_integrity_enabled() is only used by bio_integrity_enabled(). Combine these two functions. Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.peter...@oracle.com Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de -- To

Re: [PATCH 02/14] block: Replace bi_integrity with bi_special

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:36PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: For commands like REQ_COPY we need a way to pass extra information along with each bio. Like integrity metadata this information must be available at the bottom of the stack so bi_private does not suffice. Rename the

Re: [PATCH 03/14] block: Deprecate integrity tagging functions

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:37PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: None of the filesystems appear interested in using the integrity tagging feature. Potentially because very few storage devices actually permit using the application tag space. Deprecate the tagging functions. This patch

Re: [PATCH 04/14] block: Remove bip_buf

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:38PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: bip_buf is not really needed so we can remove it. Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.peter...@oracle.com Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH 05/14] block: Deprecate the use of the term sector in the context of block integrity

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:39PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: The protection interval is not necessarily tied to the logical block size of a block device. Stop using the terms sector and sectors. This does more than just renaming symbols, so it needs a better description or even better

Re: [PATCH 07/14] block: Add prefix to block integrity profile flags

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:41PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Add a BLK_ prefix to the integrity profile flags. Also rename the flags to be more consistent with the generate/verify terminology in the rest of the integrity code. Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen

Re: [PATCH 09/14] block: Relocate integrity flags

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:43PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Move flags affecting the integrity code out of the bio bi_flags and into the block integrity payload. It seems like bip is guaranteed to be non-NULL in all callers of the getters and setters. I'd recommend just dropping them

Re: [PATCH 10/14] block: Integrity checksum flag

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:44PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Make the choice of checksum a per-I/O property by introducing a flag that can be inspected by the SCSI layer. Why? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH 11/14] block: Don't merge requests if integrity flags differ

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:45PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: We'd occasionally merge requests with conflicting integrity flags. Introduce a merge helper which checks that the requests have compatible integrity payloads. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de -- To

Re: [PATCH 12/14] block: Add specific data integrity errors

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:46PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Introduce a set of error codes that can be used by the block integrity subsystem to signal which class of error was encountered by either the I/O controller or the storage device. Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen

Re: [PATCH 08/14] block: Add a disk flag to block integrity profile

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:42PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: So far we have relied on the app tag size to determine whether a disk has been formatted with T10 protection information or not. However, not all target devices provide application tag storage. Add a flag to the block

Re: [PATCH 13/14] lib: Add T10 Protection Information functions

2014-06-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
static struct blk_integrity dif_type1_integrity_crc = { .name = T10-DIF-TYPE1-CRC, - .generate_fn= sd_dif_type1_generate_crc, - .verify_fn = sd_dif_type1_verify_crc, - .tuple_size = sizeof(struct sd_dif_tuple), +

Re: [PATCH]: add debug flag parameter for SCSI tape driver

2014-06-11 Thread Kai Mäkisara (Kolumbus)
On 11.6.2014, at 2.48, Laurence Oberman lober...@redhat.com wrote: Hello Take 2 of this patch, changed module description and subject line. This patch adds a debug_flag parameter that can be set on module load, and allows the DEBUG facility without a module recompile. Usage: mpdprobe

Re: [PATCH]: add debug flag parameter for SCSI tape driver

2014-06-11 Thread Laurence Oberman
Kai, Thank you for considering this. With #define DEBUG 0 We still include #define DEB(a) #define DEBC(a) With the debug_flag we then provide the needed debug I am looking for at module load time. But I agree that it enables it for all devices and that may not be optimal I don't change the

[PATCH 1/1] drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c: remove unnecessary test on unsigned value

2014-06-11 Thread Fabian Frederick
unsigned value is never 0 Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be --- drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c b/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c index

Re: [PATCH]: add debug flag parameter for SCSI tape driver

2014-06-11 Thread Dale R. Worley
This thread leads me to ask: Do people use ANSI-formatted tapes any more? That is, tape volumes with miltiple files, header and trailer labels, etc.? Dale -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo

Re: [PATCH]: add debug flag parameter for SCSI tape driver

2014-06-11 Thread Laurence Oberman
Kai, Its likely not worth doing this, I cross checked and indeed many distros have this compiled out. So lets leave it as is. Thanks Laurence - Original Message - From: Laurence Oberman lober...@redhat.com To: Kai Mäkisara (Kolumbus) kai.makis...@kolumbus.fi Cc:

Re: [PATCH v2] sg: add SG_FLAG_Q_AT_TAIL flag

2014-06-11 Thread Mike Christie
On 06/04/2014 09:58 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: When the SG_IO ioctl was copied into the block layer and later into the bsg driver, subtle differences emerged. One difference is the way injected commands are queued through the block layer (i.e. this is not SCSI device queueing nor SATA NCQ).

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] TARGET/sbc,loopback: Adjust command data length in case pi exists on the wire

2014-06-11 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 10:24 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: On 6/11/2014 12:17 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: SNIP QT Instead of using existing value within cmd-data_length, can we calculated data_length based on secstors blocksize. cmd-data_length = sectors * dev-dev_attrib.block_size; We

Re: [PATCH] block SG_IO: add SG_FLAG_Q_AT_HEAD flag

2014-06-11 Thread Mike Christie
On 06/05/2014 09:02 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: After the SG_IO ioctl was copied into the block layer and later into the bsg driver, subtle differences emerged. One difference is the way injected commands are queued through the block layer (i.e. this is not SCSI device queueing nor SATA

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Include protection information in transport header

2014-06-11 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 12:09 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: At the SCSI transport level, there is no distinction between user data and protection information. Thus, iscsi header field expected data transfer length should include protection information. Patch #1 introduces scsi helper

Re: [PATCH v5] sg: relax 16 byte cdb restriction

2014-06-11 Thread Mike Christie
On 06/03/2014 12:18 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: v4 of this patch was sent 20131201. ChangeLog: - remove the 16 byte CDB (SCSI command) length limit from the sg driver by handling longer CDBs the same way as the bsg driver. Remove comment from sg.h

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] TARGET/sbc,loopback: Adjust command data length in case pi exists on the wire

2014-06-11 Thread Quinn Tran
On 6/11/14 2:30 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 10:24 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: On 6/11/2014 12:17 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: SNIP QT Instead of using existing value within cmd-data_length, can we calculated data_length based on secstors

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] TARGET/sbc,loopback: Adjust command data length in case pi exists on the wire

2014-06-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
nab == Nicholas A Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org writes: nab Hard to say. Discarding the transport length in v2 doesn't seem nab like a good idea, but subtracting from cmd-prot_length in v1 is nab using the sector count from the CDB anyways, so it's essentially nab the same tradeoff of

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi_cmnd: Introduce scsi_transfer_length helper

2014-06-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Sagi == Sagi Grimberg sa...@mellanox.com writes: Sagi In case protection information exists on the wire scsi transports Sagi should include it in the transfer byte count (even if protection Sagi information does not exist in the host memory space). This helper Sagi will compute the total

Re: [PATCH 03/14] block: Deprecate integrity tagging functions

2014-06-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph == Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: Deprecate the tagging functions. Christoph This patch doesn't just deprecate them but outright removes Christoph them. Fixed. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH 02/14] block: Replace bi_integrity with bi_special

2014-06-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph == Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: Christoph Instead of having a union of pointer just make it a void Christoph pointer. I also think special is a terribly generic name, but Christoph I don't really have a better idea at hand. I needed something that could encompass

Re: [PATCH 05/14] block: Deprecate the use of the term sector in the context of block integrity

2014-06-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph == Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: Christoph On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:39PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: The protection interval is not necessarily tied to the logical block size of a block device. Stop using the terms sector and sectors. Christoph This does

Re: [PATCH 09/14] block: Relocate integrity flags

2014-06-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph == Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: Christoph On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:28:43PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Move flags affecting the integrity code out of the bio bi_flags and into the block integrity payload. Christoph It seems like bip is guaranteed to be

Re: [PATCH 10/14] block: Integrity checksum flag

2014-06-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph == Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: Make the choice of checksum a per-I/O property by introducing a flag that can be inspected by the SCSI layer. Christoph Why? First of all it's desirable to be able to use both IP and CRC checksums without having to unload the HBA

Re: [PATCH 12/14] block: Add specific data integrity errors

2014-06-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph == Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: Introduce a set of error codes that can be used by the block integrity subsystem to signal which class of error was encountered by either the I/O controller or the storage device. Christoph I'd also love to see something catching

Re: [PATCH 13/14] lib: Add T10 Protection Information functions

2014-06-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph == Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: static struct blk_integrity dif_type1_integrity_crc = { Christoph Shouldn't the whole profile defintions move to the generic Christoph code as well? Yeah, good idea. Christoph Maybe the code also should live in block/ and not lib/.

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] TARGET/sbc,loopback: Adjust command data length in case pi exists on the wire

2014-06-11 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 22:32 +, Quinn Tran wrote: On 6/11/14 2:30 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 10:24 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: On 6/11/2014 12:17 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: SNIP QT Instead of using existing value within