On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:04:12PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:05 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > Hi Sir Linus
> >
> > A small administrative stuff, was on vacation and the old email bounced on
> > me.
> > I was hoping to still make the 3 weeks merge window, but it was
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 07:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:17:39AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Hopefully this is the right list for this report...
>>>
>>> I hit the following kernel bug reliably by running
METHOD_TRACE is a poorman's function tracer.
Use the actual function tracer instead (ftrace)
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
---
drivers/scsi/ips.c | 177 -
1 file changed, 177 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ips.c b/drivers/scsi/ips.c
index
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:05:31PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Hey Paolo,
>
> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 12:49 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 09/10/2014 10:49, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> > >
> > > It does not happen if you close QEMU with SIGTERM, ctrl-c, or with the
> > > "quit" comman
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:05 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Hi Sir Linus
>
> A small administrative stuff, was on vacation and the old email bounced on me.
> I was hoping to still make the 3 weeks merge window, but it was 2 weeks at the
> end.
> Your call if to make this wait for next window. Needles
On 10/17/2014 07:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:17:39AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hopefully this is the right list for this report...
>>
>> I hit the following kernel bug reliably by running xfstests test
>> generic/234 against XFS using 10GB LVM test
On 10/17/2014 07:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:12:58PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:59:34PM +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
>> wrote:
>>> One supporting example: A low limit interferes with creation of
>>> full stripe writes f
On 10/16/2014 05:59 PM, Anish Bhatt wrote:
> libcxgbi was always returning an ipv4 address for ISCSI_HOST_PARAM_IPADDRESS,
> return appropriate address based on address family
>
> Signed-off-by: Anish Bhatt
> Signed-off-by: Karen Xie
> ---
> drivers/scsi/cxgbi/libcxgbi.c | 42 ++
Hey Paolo,
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 12:49 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 09/10/2014 10:49, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> >
> > It does not happen if you close QEMU with SIGTERM, ctrl-c, or with the
> > "quit" command, because no attempt is done to bring down the VM data
> > structures (or free memor
> Are you going to prepare a set of fixups for 3.18, or should I try to cram
them together? I supect you'd do a much better job than I could.
Agreed. There are 3 patches already posted for sparse warning fixes but then
there were 5 new reports of sparse warning. So we (Dolev Raviv and myself)
wou
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Leung [mailto:jle...@v10networks.ca]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 10:39 PM
> To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org
> Cc: KY Srinivasan; james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com; Jeff Leung
> Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Sitsofe Wheeler [mailto:sits...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 9:46 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Jeff Leung; James Bottomley; Christoph Hellwig; Haiyang Zhang; Christoph
> Hellwig; Hannes Reinecke; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-scsi-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
...
> With scsi_logging_level --set --error=5, there are:
> * 10 "FAILED Result" prints
> * the first has no CDB
> * at the end, the
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 12:24 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> On 10/21/2014 2:39 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > Here are the target updates for v3.18-rc2 code. These where originally
> > destined for -rc1, but due to the combination of travel last week for
> > KVM Forum and my
> -Original Message-
> From: Hannes Reinecke [mailto:h...@suse.de]
> Sent: Monday, 20 October, 2014 1:53 AM
> To: James Bottomley
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Elliott, Robert (Server
> Storage); Hannes Reinecke
> Subject: [PATCH 27/27] scsi: ratelimit I/O error mes
Hi Sir Linus
A small administrative stuff, was on vacation and the old email bounced on me.
I was hoping to still make the 3 weeks merge window, but it was 2 weeks at the
end.
Your call if to make this wait for next window. Needless to say that it is
ZERO risk, just change of email.
Based on comm
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 04:06:29AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 03:44:16PM -0700, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
> > Looks good, Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani
>
> I'm getting a bit lost with all the UFS fixes, can you prepared a series
> with all the fixups required for 3.18
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:40:07PM +0100, Mark Knibbs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The comment for the max_channel, max_id and max_lun parameters
> refers to the first two, but actually means the last two.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Knibbs
I just noticed that I have already applied an equal patch from
Sebasti
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 01:02:48PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > What tree is this against? This doesn't seem to touch the ufs driver,
> > which in 3.18-rc has grown calls to some of the functions you remove.
> >
> Hmm. I _thought_ to have it done against core-for-3.18; but I'll
> double chec
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 05:50:32PM -0400, wenxi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> Sorry it took some time since we need to re-config the systems for this test.
>
> With Christoph's new patch only, still saw the failure.
> With Christoph's new patch + Brian's patch, works fine, didn't see the
> failur
On 10/21/2014 12:55 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> here is now the seventh iteration of my scsi logging update.
>> With this I've included another patch for ratelimiting
>> I/O error messages, which resolves the outstanding issue
>
Wendy, Brian,
can you give me an ACK for this series?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> here is now the seventh iteration of my scsi logging update.
> With this I've included another patch for ratelimiting
> I/O error messages, which resolves the outstanding issue
> noted by Robert Elliot.
What tree is this against?
On 10/21/2014 2:39 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Hi Linus,
Here are the target updates for v3.18-rc2 code. These where originally
destined for -rc1, but due to the combination of travel last week for
KVM Forum and my mistake of taking the three week merge window
literally, the pull request s
On 10/7/2014 4:07 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Improve performance by using multiple RDMA/RC channels per SCSI
host for communication with an SRP target. About the
implementation:
- Introduce a loop over all channels in the code that uses
target->ch.
- Set the SRP_MULTICHAN_MULTI flag during log
On 10/20/2014 3:56 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/19/14 19:36, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
On 10/7/2014 4:07 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
* comp_vector, a number in the range 0..n-1 specifying the
- MSI-X completion vector. Some HCA's allocate multiple (n)
- MSI-X vectors p
On 10/21/2014 11:49 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:01:25PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/19/14 18:12, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
On 10/7/2014 4:04 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
-req = blk_queue_find_tag(sdev->request_queue, tag);
+req = blk_queue_find_
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:53:38PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The above assignment statement has been reported to fix a kernel oops that
> could be triggered by cable pulling. Regarding fixing the root cause: some
> time ago I had posted a patch series that makes scsi_remove_host() wait
> unti
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:15:07PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> How about renaming this function into shost_sdev_count() and moving its
> declaration to and its implementation to
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c ?
I'd prefer to defer this until we have an actual need for it elsewhere.
--
To unsubscr
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:01:25PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/19/14 18:12, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >On 10/7/2014 4:04 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >>-req = blk_queue_find_tag(sdev->request_queue, tag);
> >>+req = blk_queue_find_tag(sdev->request_queue, tag);
> >
> >Why
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:47:53PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The only reason why patches 10/12 and 11/12 are separate patches
> is to reduce the size of individual patches and hence to make it
> easier to review these patches. If everyone agrees I'm fine with
> folding patch 11/12 into patch
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:57:21PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> That pr_err() statement was convenient while debugging the multiqueue code
> in the SRP initiator driver but can be left out. Would you agree with
> leaving the above three lines of debug code out instead of adding an
> additional a
32 matches
Mail list logo
