[ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-12-30 Thread Christoph Hellwig
It turnd out while the scsi-queue tree in general worked very well the split into core and drivers branches was rather cumbersome. For the 3.19 merge window updates and the 3.20 window I've switched to a single branch instead: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git scsi-for-3.19

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-09-16 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:58:18PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: I've pushed two updates to the core-for-3.17 branch of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git which should go to Linus before the next rc. One is a regression fix for drivers using block layer tagging when

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-09-16 Thread James Bottomley
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 14:37 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:58:18PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: I've pushed two updates to the core-for-3.17 branch of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git which should go to Linus before the next rc.

[ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-09-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi James, I've pushed two updates to the core-for-3.17 branch of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git which should go to Linus before the next rc. One is a regression fix for drivers using block layer tagging when not using blk-mq introduced in the blk-mq series, and the other

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-21 Thread adam radford
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org wrote: I've pushed out updates to both the core-for-3.17 and drivers-for-3.17 branches. I think we're in a good shape for the merge window, but I'd still like to get reviewers attention for a few driver updates that I'd love

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:33:17PM -0700, adam radford wrote: Can we get someone to finish reviewing the megaraid_sas patch series ? Or let me know if anything else needs to be corrected ? I know it has been reviewed by yourself and Martin Petersen so far, however, I could not find the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-21 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph == Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: Christoph I think I'm missing an ACK from Martin on one of the patches. Looks like I missed the updated version of these during my vacation. I'll finish reviewing megaraid_sas (and mptNsas) today. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-21 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph == Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes: Christoph I think I'm missing an ACK from Martin on one of the patches. 3/5 and 4/5 look good to me. Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.peter...@oracle.com -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:26:09PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Christoph I think I'm missing an ACK from Martin on one of the patches. 3/5 and 4/5 look good to me. Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.peter...@oracle.com Thanks Martin, I'll pull in the megaraid_sas patches for the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:47:08AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: So this is a bit late to get through linux-next and into a pull request. I was planning on sending the final pull tomorrow (in case Linus planned a surprise early release). Can we redo some of these as bug fixes and send them in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-15 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 12:25 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:47:08AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: So this is a bit late to get through linux-next and into a pull request. I was planning on sending the final pull tomorrow (in case Linus planned a surprise early

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-14 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 05:54 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:20:04AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: The drivers side are a bunch of smaller fixes for iscsi and pm8001 which never have been a problem to put in near the end of the merge window, especially if they

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-04 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:32:01PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote: On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 05:20 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: I've pushed out updates to both the core-for-3.17 and drivers-for-3.17 branches. So I'm afraid we missed the last -next build on these, so they can't go in with the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Christoph, On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 04:11:47 -0700 Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:32:01PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote: On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 05:20 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: I've pushed out updates to both the core-for-3.17 and drivers-for-3.17

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-04 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: You realise that neither of these in linux-next as the scsi-core and scsi-drivers trees had for-3.16 branches in the last round. I assume I should just drop these trees completely from linux-next? Well, they get pulled in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Christoph, On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 04:34:04 -0700 Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: You realise that neither of these in linux-next as the scsi-core and scsi-drivers trees had for-3.16 branches in the last round. I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-04 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 04:11 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:32:01PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote: On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 05:20 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: I've pushed out updates to both the core-for-3.17 and drivers-for-3.17 branches. So I'm afraid we

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I've pushed out updates to both the core-for-3.17 and drivers-for-3.17 branches. I think we're in a good shape for the merge window, but I'd still like to get reviewers attention for a few driver updates that I'd love to get in still: - my eata patch to remove the driver_lock - the partially

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-08-01 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 05:20 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: I've pushed out updates to both the core-for-3.17 and drivers-for-3.17 branches. So I'm afraid we missed the last -next build on these, so they can't go in with the early SCSI pull. I'm open to doing one mid merge window, but Linus

[ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-07-25 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I've pushed out new version of the for-3.17 core and drivers trees: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git core-for-3.17 git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git drivers-for-3.17 In the core tree the biggest update is the merge of the blk-mq support, but various smaller

Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-07-18 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I've pushed out new version of the for-3.17 core and drivers trees: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git core-for-3.17 git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git drivers-for-3.17 In the core tree the biggest update is the merge of the I/O path cleanups, in addition various

[ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

2014-07-08 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I've pushed out new version of the for-3.17 core and drivers trees: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git core-for-3.17 git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git drivers-for-3.17 In the core tree the biggest news is the old target infrastructure removal, in addition a few