On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 09:54 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hum, since this didn't quite work out, how about storing that one bit of
> information that scsi_exit_rq() needs from shost inside scsi_cmnd during
> scsi_init_rq()?
Hello Jan,
All what's missing from the patch I posted is a
On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 17:00 -0600, Scott Bauer wrote:
> I've applied this on-top of Jens' For-Linus and re-ran the test. I get the
> following scheduling
> while atomic BUG() splat:
>
> [ 35.753764] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x0100
> [ 35.754333] [ ... ]
> [ 35.765844]
On Tue 02-05-17 10:43:30, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch fixes the following KASAN complaint:
>
> ==
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in scsi_exit_rq+0xf3/0x120 at addr 8802b7fedf00
> Read of size 1 by task rcuos/5/53
> CPU: 7
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 10:43:30AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch fixes the following KASAN complaint:
>
> ==
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in scsi_exit_rq+0xf3/0x120 at addr 8802b7fedf00
> Read of size 1 by task
This patch fixes the following KASAN complaint:
==
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in scsi_exit_rq+0xf3/0x120 at addr 8802b7fedf00
Read of size 1 by task rcuos/5/53
CPU: 7 PID: 53 Comm: rcuos/6 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc5+ #13
Hardware
5 matches
Mail list logo