On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:03:10PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
- BIO flags bio-bi_rw and REQ flags req-cmd_flags no longer match.
Remove comments and do a proper translation between the 2 systems.
I'd rather see them resynchronised ... in a way that makes it obvious
that they should be
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:18:14AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I don't know whether BIO_RW_BARRIER is __REQ_SOFTBARRIER or
__REQ_HARDBARRIER, so I didn't include that in this patch. There also
doesn't seem to be a __REQ equivalent to BIO_RW_AHEAD, but we can do
the other four bits (and leave
On Wed, Dec 12 2007 at 17:18 +0200, Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:03:10PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
- BIO flags bio-bi_rw and REQ flags req-cmd_flags no longer match.
Remove comments and do a proper translation between the 2 systems.
I'd rather see
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Thats not enough You still need to fix code in ll_rw_blk(), I would
define a rq_flags_bio_match_mask = 0xf for that.
(and also add what Jens called needed with the
BIO_RW_AHEAD selects REQ_FAILFAST.)
Yes, I appreciate it's not
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:54:07AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:18:14AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I don't know whether BIO_RW_BARRIER is __REQ_SOFTBARRIER or
__REQ_HARDBARRIER, so I didn't include that in this patch. There also
doesn't seem to be a __REQ
5 matches
Mail list logo
