On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:12:00PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:42:19PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Here it was against 2.6.9. Odds are it doesn't apply anymore due to
> > some recent changes in this area. If anyone wants to take it and fix it
> > up, please do so.
> >
>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:42:19PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Here it was against 2.6.9. Odds are it doesn't apply anymore due to
> some recent changes in this area. If anyone wants to take it and fix it
> up, please do so.
>
> Note, this patch needs the evil strdup() function to work properly.
> T
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 05:15:59PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:08:55PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:03:50PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > I had a patch to do that around here
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:08:55PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:03:50PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > I had a patch to do that around here somewhere, but I think it was
> > > rejected as people can get the sa
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:03:50PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > I had a patch to do that around here somewhere, but I think it was
> > rejected as people can get the same info by using 'modinfo' instead.
> > You know, the old, "use a
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> I had a patch to do that around here somewhere, but I think it was
> rejected as people can get the same info by using 'modinfo' instead.
> You know, the old, "use a userspace tool instead of wasting kernel
> memory" argument :)
How's that
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:39:24PM -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:13:57PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I think the hardware_version, firmware_version, rom_version and
driver_version don't belong into the FC transport class,
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 12:38:31PM -0600, Brian King wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:13:57PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I think the hardware_version, firmware_version, rom_version and
driver_version don't belong into the FC transport class, there's
nothign spec
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:39:24PM -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:13:57PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > I think the hardware_version, firmware_version, rom_version and
> > > driver_version don't belong into the FC transport clas
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:13:57PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I think the hardware_version, firmware_version, rom_version and
> > driver_version don't belong into the FC transport class, there's
> > nothign specific to FC or even SCSI specific in them.
>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 12:38:31PM -0600, Brian King wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:13:57PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> >>I think the hardware_version, firmware_version, rom_version and
> >>driver_version don't belong into the FC transport class, there's
> >>nothign
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:13:57PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I think the hardware_version, firmware_version, rom_version and
driver_version don't belong into the FC transport class, there's
nothign specific to FC or even SCSI specific in them.
Then put them in the individual d
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:13:57PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I think the hardware_version, firmware_version, rom_version and
> driver_version don't belong into the FC transport class, there's
> nothign specific to FC or even SCSI specific in them.
Then put them in the individual driver (no
True. The only thing that made them FC-ish is that they were
mandated by HBAAPI. The only other desire was to place all
hbaapi-related data in a single place so users/applications don't
have to trapse through the multiple directories in the class and
device trees.
I'll ping Greg on adding them to
I think the hardware_version, firmware_version, rom_version and
driver_version don't belong into the FC transport class, there's
nothign specific to FC or even SCSI specific in them.
If you want these attributes talk to Greg about fiding a place in
the common driver model code for them.
p.s. I wa
15 matches
Mail list logo