Re: [PATCH 10/10] ufs: fix DMA mask setting

2013-08-15 Thread Akinobu Mita
On 6/29/2013 11:10 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote: 2013/6/29 James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com: On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 22:39 +0530, Santosh Y wrote: index 19618c6..431ddb2 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -1711,6 +1711,25 @@ void

Re: [PATCH 10/10] ufs: fix DMA mask setting

2013-08-10 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
On 6/29/2013 11:10 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote: 2013/6/29 James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com: On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 22:39 +0530, Santosh Y wrote: index 19618c6..431ddb2 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -1711,6 +1711,25 @@ void

[PATCH 10/10] ufs: fix DMA mask setting

2013-06-26 Thread Santosh Y
From: Akinobu Mita m...@fixstars.com If the controller doesn't support 64-bit addressing mode, it must not set the DMA mask to 64-bit. But it's unconditionally trying to set to 64-bit without checking 64-bit addressing support in the controller capabilities. It was correctly checked before