On Wed, Nov 04 2015, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 00:26 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 03 2015, James Bottomley
>> wrote:
>> >> Please spell it U32_MAX
>> >
>> > Why? there's no
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 23:13 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03 2015, James Bottomley
> wrote:
>
> > From: James Bottomley
> >
> > It was noticed that we lose precision in the final calculation for some
> > inputs. The
On Tue, Nov 03 2015, James Bottomley
wrote:
> From: James Bottomley
>
> It was noticed that we lose precision in the final calculation for some
> inputs. The most egregious example is size=3000 blk_size=1900 in units of 10
> should
From: James Bottomley
It was noticed that we lose precision in the final calculation for some
inputs. The most egregious example is size=3000 blk_size=1900 in units of 10
should yield 5.70 MB but in fact yields 3.00 MB (oops). This is because the
current algorithm doesn't
On Tue, Nov 03 2015, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 23:13 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 03 2015, James Bottomley
>> wrote:
>>
>> > From: James Bottomley
>> >
>>
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 00:26 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03 2015, James Bottomley
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 23:13 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 03 2015, James Bottomley
> >>
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 13:37 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 01:21 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > + while (blk_size >= UINT_MAX)
> > i++;
>
> (reduced CC-list)
Let's keep at least the lists in cc.
> Hello James,
>
> Is the above loop an infinite loop if blk_size >=
7 matches
Mail list logo